Why are athletes generally better looking than gymcels

allindaeyes

Banned
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
2,199
Reputation
3
Athletic body types are better, athletes generally did similar things since they were younger, more social, more adrenaline, more competition, less mundane and mechanical
 

waifulaifu

Cuck
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
65
Reputation
1
Likely because we only see the attractive athletes. I know several subhuman athletes.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
211
Reputation
4
The reason why their face is better is obvious. But why their body is better is interesting. It's because an athletic body is better balanced and more functional than a gymcel body. Women pick up on this easily. They want a guy that looks capable, not a guy who looks like he's lifted weights up and down in the same place for hours.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
156
Reputation
1
Gymcels can't hide their subhuman facial bones with curls, squats, bench pressing etc. You need gymceling + cosmetic surgery to get the full package to slay.
 

FireHaze

Gigachad
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
8,665
Reputation
15
Being an athlete requires good genes. They're natually good looking and fit.

Gymceling is fabricated and can be spotted from a mile a way.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
156
Reputation
1
waifulaifu said:
Likely because we only see the attractive athletes. I know several subhuman athletes.
Yeah, that's true soccer comes to my mind as an example of manlets and uggo athlets but between a randomly selected gymcel and a randomly selected athlete, the athlete is more likely to be a slayer. Athletes have generally more symmetry than non-athletes. A research was done. I saw it in a documentary a while back.
 

waifulaifu

Cuck
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
65
Reputation
1
Couldntthinkofaname said:
waifulaifu said:
Likely because we only see the attractive athletes. I know several subhuman athletes.
Yeah, that's true soccer comes to my mind as an example of manlets and uggo athlets but between a randomly selected gymcel and a randomly selected athlete, the athlete is more likely to be a slayer. Athletes have generally more symmetry than non-athletes. A research was done. I saw it in a documentary a while back.
Thats just because a athletes have a normal facial attractiveness distribution whereas a gymcels will have an incel facial attractiveness distribution. Unless the gymcel is extremely autistic he would have tohave bad facial bones
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
156
Reputation
1
And let's not forget that bodybuilding is an sport in itself. Schwarzenegger and his oldschool friends as well as contemporary professional competitors are indeed athletes.
 

allindaeyes

Banned
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
2,199
Reputation
3
Couldntthinkofaname said:
waifulaifu said:
Likely because we only see the attractive athletes. I know several subhuman athletes.
Yeah, that's true soccer comes to my mind as an example of manlets and uggo athlets but between a randomly selected gymcel and a randomly selected athlete, the athlete is more likely to be a slayer. Athletes have generally more symmetry than non-athletes. A research was done. I saw it in a documentary a while back.
yes soccer players get the biggest halo or w/e ( RONALDO who is considered perfect by his gay fanbase now ), a lot of them look legit subhuman and I am a fan.


Anyway the main idea is an athletic body is much better than a gymcel one
 

cel jr

Coper
Joined
Oct 8, 2017
Messages
916
Reputation
388
imbeciles... its because theyve been training more seriously and for longer periods. under the supervision of coaches and specialized trainers
 

lil truecel

Normie
Truecels
Joined
Dec 23, 2018
Messages
1,591
Reputation
1,094
athletes are born that way
their athleticism is related to their general physical superiority

being a gymcel is an artificial thing

and women know the difference
 
Top