• Stop coping, and start posting. Register an account in order to gain full access to Lookism's features.

While you cope with "muh lens distortion" just remember this, boyos.

666

chadrat
HQNP
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
21,915
Reputation
1,300




 

UglyNormalFag

serial dog molester
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Messages
31,146
Reputation
4,043
Miro and Chico look considerably worse than normal.. Gandy looks closer to his usual self but still a bit worse ratio wise

Lol @ comparing normal looking people with 1 in a million models though.... who happen to actually look worse than normal even

So what point are you trying to make? Lens distortion has been proven already... it's science at this point
 

666

chadrat
HQNP
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
21,915
Reputation
1,300
UglyNormalFag said:
Miro and Chico look considerably worse than normal.. Gandy looks closer to his usual self but still a bit worse ratio wise

Lol @ comparing normal looking people with 1 in a million models though.... who happen to actually look worse than normal even

So what point are you trying to make? Lens distortion has been proven already... it's science at this point

It is.

But I'm using this as a threshold for myself and for others who aspire to looksmax, and I mean legit looksmax.

You need to look as good as they do under those conditions, e.g. if you can look good after being "disfigured," then you've made it, boyo.
 

asiancel

Champion
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
14,251
Reputation
337
if we ddn't recgonize chico or miro, they'd be rated 5 or 6 based on those pics.
 

Enigmatic

Rotter
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
4,445
Reputation
11
asiancel said:
if we ddn't recgonize chico or miro, they'd be rated 5 or 6 based on those pics.

Legit. Just lol @ denying lens distortion.
 
Top