sparta

Cuck
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
73
Reputation
3
It's an evolutionary advantage that beta males aren't able to reproduce and pass their shitty genes for future generations.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
211
Reputation
3
It depends on how you define beta. If you think it's a good idea that degenerate drug dealers are reproducing more than hard working engineers, then you might be retarded.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
211
Reputation
3
Maximus said:
Drug dealers>Engineers

They are smarter, they put in less work and earn more money and social status. Low inhib alpha slayers prime genetics.
With that logic, we are on our way back to living in grass huts.
 
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
987
Reputation
3
sparta said:
It's an evolutionary advantage that beta males aren't able to reproduce and pass their shitty genes for future generations.
@Sparta, you can't pick and choose when and where you apply the rules of nature and the rules of civilized society. It would also be an evolutionary advantage for us to beat and gouge our rivals for food and sex, but that isn't permitted. Similarly, strictly speaking it would be an evolutionary advantage to leave those born with a disability to die, as happens in nature. Again, not how society works.

You are also making the classic basement-tier mistake of thinking that all sexual attraction is based on procreation. It is not - certainly not for many young people in their teens/20s. Plus, when the time comes, cunts are far more likely to select a man in society who can afford and provide for a family, as opposed to genetics being the outright reason for selection. If it was just purely for genes, you would have female lawyers settling with male refuse collectors and all sorts of irregular class combinations.

Hypergamy is essentially allowing females to have everything their own way without compromise. Worse, the recent rise of internet validation and the ever-increasing permeation of feminism within Western society is allowing more and more shitcunts an inflated sense of worth. For example, why should obese sluts make an effort to lose weight and appear respectable when fat-acceptance campaigns (which only consider sluts, not men) tell them they are 'beautiful'?
 

sparta

Cuck
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
73
Reputation
3
Norwood Cemetery said:
sparta said:
It's an evolutionary advantage that beta males aren't able to reproduce and pass their shitty genes for future generations.
@Sparta, you can't pick and choose when and where you apply the rules of nature and the rules of civilized society. It would also be an evolutionary advantage for us to beat and gouge our rivals for food and sex, but that isn't permitted. Similarly, strictly speaking it would be an evolutionary advantage to leave those born with a disability to die, as happens in nature. Again, not how society works.

You are also making the classic basement-tier mistake of thinking that all sexual attraction is based on procreation. It is not - certainly not for many young people in their teens/20s. Plus, when the time comes, cunts are far more likely to select a man in society who can afford and provide for a family, as opposed to genetics being the outright reason for selection. If it was just purely for genes, you would have female lawyers settling with male refuse collectors and all sorts of irregular class combinations.

Hypergamy is essentially allowing females to have everything their own way without compromise. Worse, the recent rise of internet validation and the ever-increasing permeation of feminism within Western society is allowing more and more shitcunts an inflated sense of worth. For example, why should obese sluts make an effort to lose weight and appear respectable when fat-acceptance campaigns (which only consider sluts, not men) tell them they are 'beautiful'?
In all honesty, I don't disagree with you. Your definition of hypergamy might not be completely right but that's not essential. We should question if the rules of society are rightful as that can lead to betterment. I argue that science should drive policymakers more than today.
 

BrettyBoy

Blackpilled.
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
120
Reputation
53
It depends on how you define beta. If you think it's a good idea that degenerate drug dealers are reproducing more than hard working engineers, then you might be retarded.
Your avatar: Gorillas me. XD
 

BrettyBoy

Blackpilled.
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Messages
120
Reputation
53
@Sparta, you can't pick and choose when and where you apply the rules of nature and the rules of civilized society. It would also be an evolutionary advantage for us to beat and gouge our rivals for food and sex, but that isn't permitted. Similarly, strictly speaking it would be an evolutionary advantage to leave those born with a disability to die, as happens in nature. Again, not how society works.

You are also making the classic basement-tier mistake of thinking that all sexual attraction is based on procreation. It is not - certainly not for many young people in their teens/20s. Plus, when the time comes, cunts are far more likely to select a man in society who can afford and provide for a family, as opposed to genetics being the outright reason for selection. If it was just purely for genes, you would have female lawyers settling with male refuse collectors and all sorts of irregular class combinations.

Hypergamy is essentially allowing females to have everything their own way without compromise. Worse, the recent rise of internet validation and the ever-increasing permeation of feminism within Western society is allowing more and more shitcunts an inflated sense of worth. For example, why should obese sluts make an effort to lose weight and appear respectable when fat-acceptance campaigns (which only consider sluts, not men) tell them they are 'beautiful'?
Your avatar: Norwoods me. XD