- Banned
- #1
Whitecel
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2015
- Messages
- 571
- Reputation
- 1
Let's face it. There is no actual Lookism-wide consensus of what is ideal.
Some guys prefer male faces looking like this:
Others like this:
And a million other distinct preferences.
In other words, some guys prefer American features, others Mediterranean features, others middle eastern etc. And all of these guys will push their opinions as if THEY are right. What's the big deal?
Well, the main problem is that they will suggest improvements to someone's face based on THEIR ideal. If someone swears by the second pic instead of Gandy, they will say ultra defined jaw and hollow cheeks or death.
This leads to a deluge of suggestions that never get anywhere because people's ideas of MMs vary by location and the slayers they have encountered in their lives.
I personally do not have a taste for either Gandy or the 2nd pic AT ALL.
This is one ideal for me:
The original chad thundercock. Why? because guys that look like him slay all types of girls WHERE I LIVE, aka the U.S.
So when I suggest improvements to someone's face it will consist of inevitable bias towards guys that look like him or similar.
Cliffs:
the basis of lookism is flawed.
don't pass off your MM as ideal when it is only so in your eyes
Some guys prefer male faces looking like this:

Others like this:

And a million other distinct preferences.
In other words, some guys prefer American features, others Mediterranean features, others middle eastern etc. And all of these guys will push their opinions as if THEY are right. What's the big deal?
Well, the main problem is that they will suggest improvements to someone's face based on THEIR ideal. If someone swears by the second pic instead of Gandy, they will say ultra defined jaw and hollow cheeks or death.
This leads to a deluge of suggestions that never get anywhere because people's ideas of MMs vary by location and the slayers they have encountered in their lives.
I personally do not have a taste for either Gandy or the 2nd pic AT ALL.
This is one ideal for me:

The original chad thundercock. Why? because guys that look like him slay all types of girls WHERE I LIVE, aka the U.S.
So when I suggest improvements to someone's face it will consist of inevitable bias towards guys that look like him or similar.
Cliffs:
the basis of lookism is flawed.
don't pass off your MM as ideal when it is only so in your eyes