today I measured my fwhr accurately and it's 1.94

IcedEarth

Slayer
Joined
Jul 5, 2015
Messages
3,215
Reputation
4
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
662
Reputation
1
IcedEarth said:
Machiavellian said:
Did you measure it like this?
http://lookism.net/showthread.php?tid=1340

Also do you have fat over your zygos?
yes

facial bloat is mostly gone, zygos clearly visible, only got flabby stomach and some tits

[hr]

MistGeburt3000 said:
I got you beat and i am not even eastern european :lol:
I look like Brad Pitt I'm a slayer

That picture you posted is the wrong fWHR measurement that failed to catch a lot of the zygos peak width and did the mid brow for height.

Pitt would be a 2.0 fWHR in the method from my thread. Try and mimic this:
 - Bottom of inner brow
 - top of lip (undetermined if top of lip  from highest point of philitrum or lowest)
 - Widest point of zygos (they widen further back into the face where that pic only measures front width)

https://i.gyazo.com/10eb70ff6453cf88e4dbaaa4877fe114.png

Small amount over on zygo width but good example here ^
 

IcedEarth

Slayer
Joined
Jul 5, 2015
Messages
3,215
Reputation
4
Machiavellian said:
That picture you posted is the wrong fWHR measurement that failed to catch a lot of the zygos peak width and did the mid brow for height.

Pitt would be a 2.0 fWHR in the method from my thread. Try and mimic this:
 - Bottom of inner brow
 - top of lip (undetermined if top of lip  from highest point of philitrum or lowest)
 - Widest point of zygos (they widen further back into the face where that pic only measures front width)

https://i.gyazo.com/10eb70ff6453cf88e4dbaaa4877fe114.png

Small amount over on zygo width but good example here ^
too much asperger buddy boy, I measured it the right way, I only posted that pic because it said 1.93
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
662
Reputation
1
IcedEarth said:
Machiavellian said:
That picture you posted is the wrong fWHR measurement that failed to catch a lot of the zygos peak width and did the mid brow for height.

Pitt would be a 2.0 fWHR in the method from my thread. Try and mimic this:
 - Bottom of inner brow
 - top of lip (undetermined if top of lip  from highest point of philitrum or lowest)
 - Widest point of zygos (they widen further back into the face where that pic only measures front width)

https://i.gyazo.com/10eb70ff6453cf88e4dbaaa4877fe114.png

Small amount over on zygo width but good example here ^
too much asperger buddy boy, I measured it the right way, I only posted that pic because it said 1.93
Posts: 2,269

And you are comparing your 1.9 measured right to a 1.9 measured wrong that would be a 2.0
 

IcedEarth

Slayer
Joined
Jul 5, 2015
Messages
3,215
Reputation
4
Machiavellian said:
And you are comparing your 1.9 measured right to a 1.9 measured wrong that would be a 2.0
and what if I was wrong and it's a bit bigger? lol like measuring the right way triggers cosmic events even though you haven't switched faces
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
6,020
Reputation
6
fWHR is COPE. Mine is high and it literally doesn't mean shit. It only becomes a problem if it's too low or too high, other than that it's completely irrelevant.
 

GottThaGod

Banned
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
31,051
Reputation
547
Uglylooksmaxer said:
fWHR is COPE. Mine is high and it literally doesn't mean shit. It only becomes a problem if it's too low or too high, other than that it's completely irrelevant.
What exactly do you mean with "too high"?
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
6,020
Reputation
6
GottThaGod said:
Uglylooksmaxer said:
fWHR is COPE. Mine is high and it literally doesn't mean shit. It only becomes a problem if it's too low or too high, other than that it's completely irrelevant.
What exactly do you mean with "too high"?
When your face starts looking like a football, aka Buzzcut.
 
Top