This site has a shocking track record of identifying 'Masculine/Dom' Men.

D

Double Infidelity

Guest
Shocking I tell you.

How much of a chewit do you have to be to tell baby faced brachycephalic cutie-pies like Brio, Bulldog, Wam & Mistgeburt that they're hyper masculine dominant brutes ? They have small features, full cheeks, wide round faces.

Not to say that this is a bad thing, in fact it can be argued to be a positive. However the self anointed e-phd's of facial masculinity research whom calculate a width-to-height ratio as the sole measure of masculinity are obtuse morons who should have their posting privileges rescinded.
 

Brutus

Ugly God
Birds
Joined
Aug 25, 2015
Messages
15,337
Reputation
2,970
Double Infidelity said:
Shocking I tell you.

How much of a chewit do you have to be to tell baby faced brachycephalic cutie-pies like Brio, Bulldog, Wam & Mistgeburt that they're hyper masculine dominant brutes ? They have small features, full cheeks, wide round faces.

Not to say that this is a bad thing, in fact it can be argued to be a positive. However the self anointed e-phd's of facial masculinity research whom calculate a width-to-height ratio as the sole measure of masculinity are obtuse morons who should have their posting privileges rescinded.

Masculinity isn't even a thing. T levels don't make you more attractive, and the same features make both men and women attractive (good midface+cheekbones+non-recessed jaw)

Most of the guys you listed are long midfaces cucks. Brio and Bulldog are slightly above average but mist is definitely not.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
4,252
Reputation
6
It's simple, on this board all you need to be considered masculine by posters is dark hair and swarthy looks.
 
Top