This site has a shocking track record of identifying 'Masculine/Dom' Men.

[Double Infidelity]

Shocking I tell you.

How much of a chewit do you have to be to tell baby faced brachycephalic cutie-pies like Brio, Bulldog, Wam & Mistgeburt that they're hyper masculine dominant brutes ? They have small features, full cheeks, wide round faces.

Not to say that this is a bad thing, in fact it can be argued to be a positive. However the self anointed e-phd's of facial masculinity research whom calculate a width-to-height ratio as the sole measure of masculinity are obtuse morons who should have their posting privileges rescinded.

 

[Brutus]

Shocking I tell you.

How much of a chewit do you have to be to tell baby faced brachycephalic cutie-pies like Brio, Bulldog, Wam & Mistgeburt that they're hyper masculine dominant brutes ? They have small features, full cheeks, wide round faces.

Not to say that this is a bad thing, in fact it can be argued to be a positive. However the self anointed e-phd's of facial masculinity research whom calculate a width-to-height ratio as the sole measure of masculinity are obtuse morons who should have their posting privileges rescinded.

Masculinity isn't even a thing. T levels don't make you more attractive, and the same features make both men and women attractive (good midface+cheekbones+non-recessed jaw)

Most of the guys you listed are long midfaces cucks. Brio and Bulldog are slightly above average but mist is definitely not.

 

[Heterosexual Male]

It's simple, on this board all you need to be considered masculine by posters is dark hair and swarthy looks.