masthetics

Subhuman
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Messages
3
Reputation
0
jfl these rates are so retarded. 3 psl? 3.4 psl? this guy is clearly at least a 4 psl maybe even a bit more like 4.25-4.5

pretty good side profile btw
 

elmoggerino

Gigachad
Joined
Feb 2, 2019
Messages
6,395
Reputation
543
jfl these rates are so retarded. 3 psl? 3.4 psl? this guy is clearly at least a 4 psl maybe even a bit more like 4.25-4.5

pretty good side profile btw
he is below average which means below 4PSL, he is a 4/10 maybe
 

masthetics

Subhuman
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Messages
3
Reputation
0
he is below average which means below 4PSL, he is a 4/10 maybe
you're deluded, he's not in anyway below average. he's average to slightly above average if anything (4 PSL to 4.5 PSL, so about a 5 or a 5.5 out of 10). your saying he's below average just tells me how little you really know about facial aesthetics

his side profile alone is like 4.75-5 PSL. his frontal is noticeably lower but it's definitely not below a 4 PSL

frontally his face seems fairly symmetric, and ratios are more or less good (with regard to main ratios, only his ES ratio is somewhat off and maybe chin-to-philtrum ratio could be better too; but FWHR is top-tier and midface is compact). his hairline is NW0 with very good, dense hair. nose is fine frontally as well. the only main flaws frontally are: eye area and lower third. eye area wise: lack of UES (orbital vector seems neutral to slightly negative), lateral orbital rims could be better, some UEE (w/ negatively tilted supraorbital rims), and of course canthal tilt could be better (and obviously eyebrows could be denser and eyelashes could use *some* work). PFL is somewhat low too. lower third wise: jaw could be more angular from front (jaw width is already good, despite his bigonial width being *somewhat* narrower than his bizygomatic width) and chin could be about 1 cm taller (as well as more square).

profile wise his only main flaw is: nose. he could lose the dorsal hump and benefit from a straighter nose (as his nose atm is slightly hooked and downturned). aside from that, he could benefit from a *somewhat* higher gonial angle. also, his paranasal area could use some slight forward projection too in order for his face to be more harmonious profile-wise with relation to his mandible. overall his forward growth is decent though (mandible being better than maxilla in this regard, but his maxilla is not recessed by any means); mandible is more or less vertically aligned with the glabella, which is ideal. he has a fairly high hyoid bone as well, which helps too.

this is just a *brief* assessment from all the pictures presented above. but, all that said, this guy is most definitely not below average (as I said, objectively he's 4 PSL at worst, probably 4.25-4.5 PSL though). either you're trolling or you just aren't well-versed in facial aesthetics
 
Last edited:

Squishy

Cuck
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
69
Reputation
2
Pretty robust bizygomatic and bigonial width. Forward grown mandible is also pretty good. But your lower third is vertically short compared to the middle and it's a bit emasculating. It doesn't seem like your IPD is actually that bad but more so an illusion created by the robust zygos. Your face looks a tad bloated. What's your BF percentage? Overall, probably a 4.5 PSL.