More on: How women destroy civilisation

[demen]

yeah getting divorced these days isn't even a big deal anymore.
Giving woman sexual freedom means slutty behaviour is ok.

I love sluts and the way they dress, behave and look slutty tho… but because of them, being "incel" is mainstream now. Says enough

 

[Souvlaki]

people need to get back to Jesus

 

[subhuman_curry]

don't you claim to have fucked 150+ women off tinder and nightclubs? can't really complain too much about degeneracy if you're taking part in it

it's all about being a celibate chad until marriage and either letting them down gently or breaking their heart depending on how good their game is

 

[FatalFlaw]

this is not 100% true, in Ancient greece and Rome women enjoyed a wide variety of perks and freedom and society flurished.

The problem in todays world is the big increase in entitlement and false song of "equal opportunity" and all people being "equal" making men delusional

Freedoms and rights for women are fine. Libertine sexual freedom for everyone is bad.

 

[alexio]

This is why its weird some guys on here talk about wanting a gf or marriage. Ladyboys in thailand and SA are more feminine thn the average woman nowadays.

 

[PunchFace]

freedom is a failed social experiment.

 

[zombie]

And who gave women freedom?

THE BOOMERS

 

[RealRob]

INCEL GIVE UP

Legit video

 

[Lurkerslap]

Dont marry sluts is all you can do. Too many desperate losers out there who allow these women to fuck around as much as they want then willingly settle with them later on.

 

[uglysmile]

From an eugenic position:

Of the 80/20 rule is not applied the children become weak disgraces full of diseases which should not have happened as only the best men should have fucked all the women.

Bei top 20 or die. This is my philosophy

 

[pacho]

From an eugenic position:

Of the 80/20 rule is not applied the children become weak disgraces full of diseases which should not have happened as only the best men should have fucked all the women.

Bei top 20 or die. This is my philosophy

and because you are so eugenic you allow females like this to reproduce because...?

 

[uglysmile]

and because you are so eugenic you allow females like this to reproduce because...?

Noone would do it.

But you would do it with every plain non deformed women. Also with fat women. Their genetics do not have to be bad. They just lack self discipline

 

[pacho]

Noone would do it.

But you would do it with every plain non deformed women. Also with fat women. Their genetics do not have to be bad. They just lack self discipline

makes zero sense.

if you would be serious with eugenics only the best men AND the best women would reproduce. this can be seen amongst wolves for example.

 

[uglysmile]

makes zero sense.

if you would be serious with eugenics only the best men AND the best women would reproduce. this can be seen amongst wolves for example.

Yes but not among humans. The worst 20% of women do not reproduce too.

Somehow you have to get enough children and 20% of women can't give birth to a big amount of children.

If you apply 20/20 one women would have to drop 10 children to achieve 2 children per woman.

Thatswhy many women have to give birth.

 

[quadriplegic]

and because you are so eugenic you allow females like this to reproduce because...?

 

[dragagaga]

why this nigger didnt write TLDR

 

[pacho]

Yes but not among humans. The worst 20% of women do not reproduce too.

Somehow you have to get enough children and 20% of women can't give birth to a big amount of children.

If you apply 20/20 one women would have to drop 10 children to achieve 2 children per woman.

Thatswhy many women have to give birth.

this part is not legit. if i remember correctly actually over 90% of women reproduce through all parts of history. could be wrong though. somebody look it up please.

the rest is technically somehow legit even though id take this whole eugenic thing with a bit of salt though.

incels think 2 beautiful parents will automatically create a more beautiful child. this isnt the case in fact the kids of them are very likely to look less good than them.

Royal Statistical Society Publications

rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

and if you look at the parents of chico, sean opry and gandy you dont see chad and stacy. chicos father would probably considered a subhuman here (even if adjusted for age).

by your logic he shouldnt have reproduced.

 

[Crescogenic]

 

[uglysmile]

this part is not legit. if i remember correctly actually over 90% of women reproduce through all parts of history. could be wrong though. somebody look it up please.

the rest is technically somehow legit even though id take this whole eugenic thing with a bit of salt though.

incels think 2 beautiful parents will automatically create a more beautiful child. this isnt the case in fact the kids of them are very likely to look less good than them.

Royal Statistical Society Publications

rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

and if you look at the parents of chico, sean opry and gandy you dont see chad and stacy. chicos father would probably considered a subhuman here (even if adjusted for age).

by your logic he shouldnt have reproduced.

The possibility that 2 healthy good looking people will have a healthy good looking kid is higher than 2 people with bad genetics.

Of course even the best looking people can have genetically bad children and the other way around. But statistically there will be more healthy children from gl people.

By the eugenic logic only

 

[uglysmile]

80/20 is very flexible.

Sometimes the quality of the genes is good on more than 20 percent of the males. It can be 40/80 or whatever.