- Jul 1, 2015
The more you are in the normal range the more other things become important. But yeah, if your skull is comically small like ours, everything else is irrelevant. :lol:
RodgerRabbit said:What do you call someone with a robust skull, wide frame and 6 foot 5?
Bruh, there's only the face. It's all there ever was...all there ever will be. Accept it.
Techno Viking said:Spectre said:Glabella to occipital length is what fucks me, I have a 9.5 inch skull in length, 5.7 inch zygos, blends in fairly well when compared to my friends how are 6'2''+ (I'm 6'1'') Yet somehow I've defied nature by having a 22.7 inch circumference. If I turn my head I look like a fucking preteen.
Oh well, the only feedback I've gotten is complements on the size, guess it isn't that big of a deal after a certain point.
zygos are decent, they're slightly above average. Having a short glabella to occiputal length isn't the end of the world, you just look a bit "off" from certain angles. I'm fucked though since my skull is narrow from the front. I have a bigger skull circumf than you but narrower zygos and probably cranium too
sephon said:yea literally
you can have a 1 inch microcock, 12 inch clavicles, 1mm IPD, 0.1 fwhr, nw99, but if your skull is 99.9th percentile it's all fine