Intelligence and long-term relationships

igesio

Banned
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
1,851
Reputation
2
"Intelligence is negatively associated with sex frequency," says Rosemary Hopcroft, a sociologist at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. "It's a bit dismaying."
[font=Arial, Helvetica, 'DejaVu Sans', sans-serif]And people with higher education levels generally have lower numbers of sexual partners. The latest National Survey of Family Growth shows that, for example, men with college degrees are half as likely to have had four or more partners in the last year as men with a high school education alone.[/font]



A group of Czech researchers has conducted a study in which they determined that the perceived intelligence of men correlates strongly with their actual intelligence [font=Arial, FreeSans, Helvetica, sans-serif]– but the same doesn't hold true for women.[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica, 'DejaVu Sans', sans-serif]
[/font]

[font=Arial, Helvetica, 'DejaVu Sans', sans-serif]Note: the left face is a slayer. Higher fWHR (much shorter midface) and lower, more tilted brows.[/font]

Men's fWHR was positively associated with their perceived dominance, likelihood of being chosen for a second date, and attractiveness to women for short-term, but not long-term, relationships.
 

incelhero

Normie
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Messages
1,014
Reputation
1
legit, I can measure how smart someone is just by looking at him
 

AsymmetryIsDeath

3/10 in Serbia
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
22,430
Reputation
5,987
on today's episode of thread necromancy: a very legit but oft forgotten redpill. high T = low iq. dysgenics is occurring naturally and in just a few decades we'll all be fucking retarded and back in the stone age. thank you, feminism!
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
4,670
Reputation
8
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
on today's episode of thread necromancy: a very legit but oft forgotten redpill. high T = low iq. dysgenics is occurring naturally and in just a few decades we'll all be fucking retarded and back in the stone age. thank you, feminism!
the races dont have the same iq distribution.

evolution deems it impossible
 

AsymmetryIsDeath

3/10 in Serbia
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
22,430
Reputation
5,987
Earl Sanders said:
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
on today's episode of thread necromancy: a very legit but oft forgotten redpill. high T = low iq. dysgenics is occurring naturally and in just a few decades we'll all be fucking retarded and back in the stone age. thank you, feminism!
the races dont have the same iq distribution.

evolution deems it impossible
which is why bbcs are outbreeding whites
 

Alexander

Incel
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Messages
116
Reputation
0
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
on today's episode of thread necromancy: a very legit but oft forgotten redpill. high T = low iq. dysgenics is occurring naturally and in just a few decades we'll all be fucking retarded and back in the stone age. thank you, feminism!
High T = low iq = low inhibition = successful pattern of sexual behavior. Being low iq and low inhibition is unfortunately the best sexual strategy for reproductive success. Even in the modern day and age we are still influenced by our cave man mating mind. 

Feminism has little to do with it tbh.
 

AsymmetryIsDeath

3/10 in Serbia
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
22,430
Reputation
5,987
Alexander said:
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
on today's episode of thread necromancy: a very legit but oft forgotten redpill. high T = low iq. dysgenics is occurring naturally and in just a few decades we'll all be fucking retarded and back in the stone age. thank you, feminism!
High T = low iq = low inhibition = successful pattern of sexual behavior. Being low iq and low inhibition is unfortunately the best sexual strategy for reproductive success. Even in the modern day and age we are still influenced by our cave man mating mind. 

Feminism has little to do with it tbh.
wtf are you saying feminism has little to do with it? before feminism everyone got married in their early 20s, so everyone reproduced. what determined success more than anything was your iq, as the higher your iq the better job you'd get and the more wealth you'd get. all the rich and powerful families were full of fucking geniuses.
 

kunikus

Can you remember a single op from this guy
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Messages
8,372
Reputation
15
Alexander said:
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
on today's episode of thread necromancy: a very legit but oft forgotten redpill. high T = low iq. dysgenics is occurring naturally and in just a few decades we'll all be fucking retarded and back in the stone age. thank you, feminism!
High T = low iq = low inhibition = successful pattern of sexual behavior. Being low iq and low inhibition is unfortunately the best sexual strategy for reproductive success. Even in the modern day and age we are still influenced by our cave man mating mind. 

Feminism has little to do with it tbh.
:fingerwave:  :boat:


 

Alexander

Incel
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Messages
116
Reputation
0
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
Alexander said:
High T = low iq = low inhibition = successful pattern of sexual behavior. Being low iq and low inhibition is unfortunately the best sexual strategy for reproductive success. Even in the modern day and age we are still influenced by our cave man mating mind. 

Feminism has little to do with it tbh.
wtf are you saying feminism has little to do with it? before feminism everyone got married in their early 20s, so everyone reproduced. what determined success more than anything was your iq, as the higher your iq the better job you'd get and the more wealth you'd get. all the rich and powerful families were full of fucking geniuses.
And how is feminism preventing any of that from happening in the modern age? 

High T, low iq and low inhibition have ALWAYS been the best traits for reproductive success, before AND after feminism came to existence. 

what determined success more than anything was your iq, as the higher your iq the better job you'd get and the more wealth you'd get. all the rich and powerful families were full of fucking geniuses.
Maybe this was how the mating game worked in certain small places like cities, but everywhere else low iq/low inhibition = more reproductive success.
[hr]
kunikus said:
Alexander said:
High T = low iq = low inhibition = successful pattern of sexual behavior. Being low iq and low inhibition is unfortunately the best sexual strategy for reproductive success. Even in the modern day and age we are still influenced by our cave man mating mind. 

Feminism has little to do with it tbh.

 

AsymmetryIsDeath

3/10 in Serbia
Staff member
Joined
Apr 30, 2017
Messages
22,430
Reputation
5,987
Alexander said:
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
wtf are you saying feminism has little to do with it? before feminism everyone got married in their early 20s, so everyone reproduced. what determined success more than anything was your iq, as the higher your iq the better job you'd get and the more wealth you'd get. all the rich and powerful families were full of fucking geniuses.
And how is feminism preventing any of that from happening in the modern age? 

High T, low iq and low inhibition have ALWAYS been the best traits for reproductive success, before AND after feminism came to existence. 

what determined success more than anything was your iq, as the higher your iq the better job you'd get and the more wealth you'd get. all the rich and powerful families were full of fucking geniuses.
Maybe this was how the mating game worked in certain small places like cities, but everywhere else low iq/low inhibition = more reproductive success.
[hr]
how the fuck can you be so fucking ignorant about recent history? you can even see how monogamy worked in modern fucking tv shows you dipshit.

low iq/inhib did not give you more reproductive success since everyone had 1 partner for life you fucking idiot.

and how is feminism preventing it? are you fucking trolling or what? have you never heard of the sexual revolution? no-faults divorce? hook-up culture and hypergamy? the acceptance of pre-marital sex?

used to be that if a woman got pregnant before marriage she'd be disowned and considered damaged property, and no guy would go near her. used to be that you couldn't just divorce and steal the house, the kids and half the guy's pay-check. used to be that if you cheated, your husband could just divorce you and leave you with nothing. used to be that most women were virgins at marriage. and it's proven fact that women who were virgins at marriage had/have(however rare they are now) happier marriages and lower divorce rates. feminism ruined that all.
 

Alexander

Incel
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Messages
116
Reputation
0
AsymmetryIsDeath said:
[hr]
how the fuck can you be so fucking ignorant about recent history? you can even see how monogamy worked in modern fucking tv shows you dipshit.

low iq/inhib did not give you more reproductive success since everyone had 1 partner for life you fucking idiot.

and how is feminism preventing it? are you fucking trolling or what? have you never heard of the sexual revolution? no-faults divorce? hook-up culture and hypergamy? the acceptance of pre-marital sex?

used to be that if a woman got pregnant before marriage she'd be disowned and considered damaged property, and no guy would go near her. used to be that you couldn't just divorce and steal the house, the kids and half the guy's pay-check. used to be that if you cheated, your husband could just divorce you and leave you with nothing. used to be that most women were virgins at marriage. and it's proven fact that women who were virgins at marriage had/have(however rare they are now) happier marriages and lower divorce rates. feminism ruined that all.
low iq/inhib did not give you more reproductive success since everyone had 1 partner for life you fucking idiot.

That does not disprove the fact that low iq/low inhibition leads to more reproductive success at all. Did low inhibition men not succeed in obtaining 1 partner for life? The best measure of reproductive success is the number of descendants achieved. Low iq/low inhib men DO and DID achieve higher numbers in this measure. 

and how is feminism preventing it? are you fucking trolling or what? have you never heard of the sexual revolution? no-faults divorce? hook-up culture and hypergamy? the acceptance of pre-marital sex?
Yes all of those things happened and none of them are strong proof of high iq/high inhibition being better traits for reproductive success than low iq/low inhibition before feminism.
 

Leans

Gigachad
Joined
Mar 26, 2016
Messages
9,675
Reputation
7
Let me guess...

High t is linked to lower iq and well being

Low t is linked to high iq and depression

Yawn
 
Top