B
brad
Guest
The risk of infection is on par with osteotomies and it's aesthetically better option than traditional ZSO and CWO.
IcedEarth said:
brad said:The risk of infection is on par with osteotomies and it's aesthetically better option than traditional ZSO and CWO.
brad said:You should get them too. Oh, I forgot you're a dirt poor Romanian.
modified said:brad said:The risk of infection is on par with osteotomies and it's aesthetically better option than traditional ZSO and CWO.
Who's bone is being used? Cadaveric? What's the rejection risk?
Also, second for before and afters. Cheekbone implants generally suck. I think speculatively this is because the cheekbones are most significant as points of muscle insertion for the face, and adding an implant generally doesn't change the actual insertion points for the muscle. It's just a "nonfunctional" lump under the skin.
My opinion anyway.
I've never seen an impressive before/after cheek implant of any kind.