GTFIH! Good looking people/objects are all AESTHETICALLY AERODYNAMIC

[LordSUPER]

A fat blob doesn't look like he's going to get from the chips to the remote in 0-5 seconds.

---

The angularity that cheekbones, forward growth and low bodyfat create almost resembles something that can travel at high speeds, something powerful and superior. This is why Supercars, Fighter jets and Models are high status and attractive compared to their less ideal counterparts. 
You will almost always see something with a positive eye tilt or tapering of the cheekbones. Anything cheap, non attractive or of low value will look goofy. Here is a comparison of attractive (aerodynamic) on left versus non attractive (goofy looking) on right:

[img=480x300]http://cdn.gmotors.co.uk/news/wp-co...haw.com/gen/download/nissan-micra--2938[/img]
[img=400x300]http://media.defenceindustrydaily.c...m/data_images/out/28/999797-corsair.jpg[/img]
[img=356x200]http://www.boeing.com/resources/boe...m-large-5/douglas-dc-3-john-haldane.jpg[/img]
[img=375x300]http://www.audubon.org/sites/defaul...zing-animals/images/profile_167_600.jpg[/img]
[img=501x250]http://mms.businesswire.com/media/2...hotos/airliners/7/5/1/1956157.jpg?v=v20[/img]
[img=435x250]http://www.eurail.com/sites/eurail....Freight-Train-contemplative-imaging.jpg[/img]
[img=208x300]http://www.womenlargejaw.com/sites/...AAAAAAEA/-NISWUvCHXM/s1600/DSC00103.JPG[/img]
[img=400x300]http://www.out.com/sites/out.com/fi...p-all-on-white-background-127259666.jpg[/img]
[img=762x370]http://paperaeroplanes.com/dihedraleffect1.jpg[/img]

 

[Ryu]

legit theory

 

[IWannabeGoodLooking]

whoa legit

 

[ItWontBeMe]

This gave me hope because I remembered when someone told me I looked "aerodynamic"... but then I remembered they were referring to my NW2.5 hairline (they specifically mentioned hairstyle). Just imagine fitting a golf ball where the temple hair should be... there is just bare skin in that area.  

But sorry for derailing.

Legit thread. This is new/unique srs

 

[LordSUPER]

This gave me hope because I remembered when someone told me I looked "aerodynamic"... but then I remembered they were referring to my NW2.5 hairline (they specifically mentioned hairstyle). Just imagine fitting a golf ball where the temple hair should be... there is just bare skin in that area.  

But sorry for derailing.

Legit thread. This is new/unique srs

I've always known this, I assumed people already knew it but I'm surprised they don't, I thought it was common knowledge.

 

[ItWontBeMe]

This gave me hope because I remembered when someone told me I looked "aerodynamic"... but then I remembered they were referring to my NW2.5 hairline (they specifically mentioned hairstyle). Just imagine fitting a golf ball where the temple hair should be... there is just bare skin in that area.  

But sorry for derailing.

Legit thread. This is new/unique srs

I've always known this, I assumed people already knew it but I'm surprised they don't, I thought it was common knowledge.

It's not really a rehash of angularity theory

There's more to what you're saying. It's fresh and uniquely put

 

[Danny the chav]

Brutal redpill

 

[Anakind]

 

[LordSUPER]

this would mean narrow head retruded tiny chin would be above high fwhr and anteface because less space for wind to dock and retruded chin etc cuts the wind better then ante

retruded chin causes too much drag, the jaw angle has to be good
[img=546x500]http://virtualskies.arc.nasa.gov/aeronautics/images/airflow.jpg[/img]