Black Pill Enough of this stupid wide face cope and Barret is not attractive

ace2020

Coper
Truecels
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
589
Reputation
149
The guy on the left mogs HARD, its not even close, they live in totally different realities. A well proportioned face
with a prominent lower third (width and depth of lower third is key) is important for attraction but the key is to have a narrower and taller face. Wide and round zygos like the guy on the right has are just feminine. In fact, most attractive women have a face closer to the guy on the right b/c attractive male faces aren't supposed to be wide, it has no sex appeal at all.
narrow vs wide.png
 

ace2020

Coper
Truecels
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
589
Reputation
149
really contradicts FWHR
makes me rather confused
big fwhr is just a stupid theory, prolly the most stupid one out there. girls worship mendes and good looking men with tall faces and good lower thirds, not barret. i guarentee you, go to the mall or anywhere and some girls b/w 16 to 25 who they find more attractive - mendes or barret and it wont even be close. they find barret gross and feminine. wide faces suck. period
 

Jew147

Banned
Joined
Jul 21, 2020
Messages
823
Reputation
310
big fwhr is just a stupid theory, prolly the most stupid one out there. girls worship mendes and good looking men with tall faces and good lower thirds, not barret. i guarentee you, go to the mall or anywhere and some girls b/w 16 to 25 who they find more attractive - mendes or barret and it wont even be close. they find barret gross and feminine. wide faces suck. period
 

hurdleafterhurdle

Cuck
Autists
Joined
Jun 4, 2020
Messages
94
Reputation
33
No shit the guys arguing this are coping. Guy on the left massively mogs guy on the right and every guy I know with chadlite to high normie tier behaviour has this face type. Actual chads and up got a bit more chin.
 

ace2020

Coper
Truecels
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
589
Reputation
149
The guy on the left mogs HARD, its not even close, they live in totally different realities. A well proportioned face
with a prominent lower third (width and depth of lower third is key) is important for attraction but the key is to have a narrower and taller face. Wide and round zygos like the guy on the right has are just feminine. In fact, most attractive women have a face closer to the guy on the right b/c attractive male faces aren't supposed to be wide, it has no sex appeal at all.
View attachment 81898
@hurdleafterhurdle
 

JeromeMorrow

discriminated by dna
HQNP
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
321
Reputation
242
if you would morph the "narrow face" wide and the "broad face" narrow nothing regarding attractivness would change even now that they changed position regarding fwhr

its not like a big fwhr is unattractive, its just more that your fwhr barely matters regarding attractivness (excluding extrem cases of narrow/horse faces) other features such as forward growth are more important
 

JeromeMorrow

discriminated by dna
HQNP
Joined
Jul 20, 2020
Messages
321
Reputation
242
+ you have to consider

a) how the study was made (they formed two groups according to the rate the faces they got (attractive and unattractive) and then made a prototype of each group by morphing all faces of the particular group together
b) that fat and bloated people have higher fwhrs in general


so all the fat and bloated people with no definition landed in the unattractive group and increased its fwhr.
 

ace2020

Coper
Truecels
Joined
Jan 18, 2020
Messages
589
Reputation
149
if you would morph the "narrow face" wide and the "broad face" narrow nothing regarding attractivness would change even now that they changed position regarding fwhr

its not like a big fwhr is unattractive, its just more that your fwhr barely matters regarding attractivness (excluding extrem cases of narrow/horse faces) other features such as forward growth are more important
????
clearly the guy on the left looks better b/c he is narrower tho? more harmonious and his lower third is so much better
 
Top