• Stop coping, and start posting. Register an account in order to gain full access to Lookism's features.

(anthropology)[Asians are not a Paedomorphic /feminized race ]

Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
their  neotenous features,pancake faces etc are merely ancestral features.

asians are basically  lightskinned straight haired Negritos/Aetas  that popped up 10,000  yrs ago.

they  didnt undergo any neotenous changes or feminine changes as they have low hormone levels    .

asians are   basically negroids  .they arent  a advanced race or anything,their evolution from aetas is quiet recent relatively  speaking in  simple  terms  .
 

envyh

Joke
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
176
Reputation
0

Clearly not a true White man.
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
model shown: Jelena Jensen from Pinup files (adult site).
Comment
Let us say that beauty pageant contestants must be 18- to 26-year-olds between 5-foot-6 and 5-foot-10, and are drawn from two populations with average adult female heights of 5-foot-1 and 5-foot-5.  Assume that the standard deviation of height in both populations is 2.5 inches and that height is normally distributed in both populations.  Thus, the candidates for the pageant will be drawn from 2.26% of 18- to 26-year-olds from the shorter population and 32.18% of the taller population in the same age range.  If the number of women in the 18- to 26-year-old range is the same in both populations, the taller population offers a lot more women to choose from, and can therefore be more selective in choosing its candidates.  Alternatively, the 5-foot-6 to 5-foot-10 range being closer to the mean of the taller population, a greater proportion of women in this height range will be within normal variation on multiple counts in the taller population, and the taller population will offer a much greater proportion of women among the height eligibles as potential contestants for the pageant.  Therefore, if the sizes of these populations are in the millions, then few to none of the contestants from the shorter population will be able to match the attractiveness of the candidates from the taller population, making it difficult to achieve meaningful high profile cross-population aesthetic comparisons in international beauty pageants.
Alternatively, let us address something that is more relevant to a beauty pageant, namely the feminine appearance of the physique of women.  Typically, East Asian women (e.g., Fig 5a) are easily outcompeted by European women when it comes to presenting a feminine physique, even if the European women are not particularly feminine (e.g., Fig 5b).  However, it is not difficult to find voluptuous East Asian women (Fig 5c), though the woman shown in Fig 5c would need a lot more than mere voluptuousness in order to participate in a high profile beauty pageant; longer legs for instance.  On the other hand, if one were to avoid the normally short-legged East Asian women (Fig 5c, leftmost woman in Fig 5d) and seek longer-legged East Asian women, one will be easily successful, but may end up with a woman having a flattened backside (the middle woman in Fig 5d), and even if one manages to find a "long legs-more prominent backside" combination, the woman may be naturally flat-chested (rightmost woman in Fig 5d; flat chest not shown).  It would surely not be an easy task to find very many East Asian women with the long-legged and feminine appearance of the European woman shown in Fig 5e.
[img=539x600]http://www.femininebeauty.info/images/carol.jpg[/img][/CENTER]
Fig 5a. Carol from Domai; adult site.​
[img=400x691]http://www.femininebeauty.info/images/inna.jpg[/img][/CENTER]
Fig 5b. Inna from Domai; adult site.​
Fig 5c. Voluptuous Japanese; click image for larger version.​
Fig 5d. Hiromi Anzai (left), Ai Komori (middle) and Japanese from Met Art (adult site); click for larger image.​
 

Aparat

Regular
Joined
Sep 30, 2015
Messages
1,787
Reputation
2
If Asians are just lighter skinned Negritos with straight hair, how come their lifespan isn't the same? Negritos(women) on average reach adult height at 12/13 and their life expectancy is only 27.3 years. Asians have the highest life expectancy and later/longer puberty. I don't think medicine and the environment can compensate, the difference is too much.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
260
Reputation
1
What is the decent of the North East Asians (Koreans and Japanese).

From what i understand the Japanese are mostly Koreans with some white admixture from the Ainu and Jumon. Where did the Koreans come from then? Was there any White admixture? How can they be primitive with respectable IQ averages?
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
MakeAmericaGreatAgain said:
What is the decent of the North East Asians (Koreans and Japanese).

From what i understand the Japanese are mostly Koreans with some white admixture from the Ainu and Jumon. Where did the Koreans come from then? Was there any White admixture? How can they be primitive with respectable IQ averages?

koreans are tungusic  peoples  ,neomongoloids  ,just like OP.they have some native admixture but its small and because of assimilation and genocide.

Japanese are  neomongoloid  +   Austronesian  people with some having ainu admixture,but not much  .


IQ  can change in a couple of generations and different environments.

look at aetas,you can even see the mongoloid features and the  paedomorphic statures.


modern day negroids are heavily dimorphized and evolved due to sexual selection  in africa due to abundance of resources and women only fucking the high t brutes etc

the earliest africans looked like negritos,you can see the features of all races in em,but mostly mongoloid.

abos arent the oldest human  substratum as they mixed with homo erectus and denisova  etc  they  are basically untermensch and not pure human  .
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
260
Reputation
1
https://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/australoid-genes-in-southeast-asians/#comment-9055

Japanese are not so pure! All a Japanese is is a cross between a Korean and an Ainu. That’s it!
The Koreans came to Korea from Mongolia about 5,000 years ago. There were earlier people living there but they were wiped out. Nothing is known about them. They may have been Ainu types, no one knows.
When the Ainu came to Japan 16,000 YBP, there were already Negrito types living there. The Ainu apparently wiped them out.
Koreans, Japanese and NE Asians are closely related to Caucasians, but they don’t have any Caucasian in them.
9,000 YBP, all NE Asians looked like Ainu types. After 9,000 YBP, NE Asians started transitioning from Ainu types to the type we know them as now.
The Negritos are Southern China are NOT Black people! They are about as distantly related genetically to Blacks of anyone on Earth. Just cuz someone looks Black does not mean they are Black. The Negritos are very ancient, the remains of the first people out of Africa.
Chinese are a mish-mash of all sorts of different ethnic groups, and Northern Chinese are further from Southern Chinese than Whites are from Asians! Doesn’t seem like such a pure race to me!
I love Korean people. Especially Korean women, haha.
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
robert lindsay has good stuff but hes too simplified in his views,for one there wasnt any  negrito-ainuid-then mongoloid transition phase.  protomongoloid is bullshit and doesnt exist,its a debunked category.

it was basically negrito(ice age)then mongoloids  5000 YBP  ,but they were a small minority in asia still,as until recentely most of asia was still either southern australoid(negrito,abo,papuan the latter two having  non homosapien  admix hence their  looks)or cold adapted australoid(basically the native americans wich would later head west mixing with  E1b1b1  eastafricans and create the caucasoid race)

mongoloid expansion is very recent  and they won because they developed rice farming quicker,were neolithic,and likely faired against the hunter gatherer societies(same reason europeans faired so well against native societies).a type of guns,germs,steel type of conquest.

Negritos ARE  black people,Hominid on  forumbiodiversity explains it so suppely:  imagine a breed of dogs,all of them descend from  a wolf  ,so most dog breeds are very far removed from wolves however that doesnt mean  wolves and dogs have no connection or simpely by chance developed the same features,in  african terms  ,modern day negroids evolved  and also mixed with  eurasians from back migrations  while aetas stayed isolate  .thus africans are mixed and more evolved blacks,but nevertheless still the closest ina  way to  australoids.


its wierd how most people think blacks in africa didnt evolve  for 100,000 years or  mix with non africans at all  lol  


they superficially look at their features and think they are the most archaic and primitive humans,not so at all.evolution didnt stay dormant in the continent after the first wave of human migration OOA.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
260
Reputation
1
White people existed in our present form 5000 years ago. LOL now you're sounding like some afrocentrist making up history.

And the diseases that killed the Native Americans (small pox and the plague) came from their Asian cousins who gave them to Europeans.
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
this got nothing to do with white people.5000 yrs is nothing in human terms,10,000 itself is young and very recent.

thats fucking 3000 BCE.

I  put asians at about 12,000  BCE as a distinct racial  entity.
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
people think northeastasians are some kind of evolved   master   gook   :help:

they are even more primitive than  austronesians,having alien gook  eyes  ,  flat noses and cartoonish faces,theyre called tungids.basically eskimos.
 

SINGULARITY

Megastar
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
9,229
Reputation
20
ChiefofThechoctaws said:
people think northeastasians are some kind of evolved   master   gook   :help:

they are even more primitive than  austronesians,having alien gook  eyes  ,  flat noses and cartoonish faces,theyre called tungids.basically eskimos.



ROCK CLAPPING X999999999999
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
1,933
Reputation
3
Regarding the allegedly more pedomorphic face and thereby greater femininity of East Asians, the mid-facial flattening of East Asian faces, and also several sub-Saharan African populations such as the Khoi-San people, is similar to that of anatomically modern humans in the late Pleistocene, and if one assumes that this flattening reflects differential retention of an ancestral feature, then it cannot be called pedomorphic, especially since it has been shown that neoteny applies to human craniofacial size but not craniofacial shape. It is true that the faces of women are closer to those of children, but it has not been shown that the mid-facial flattening of East Asians is a consequence of greater feminization. You also have to consider that close approximations of an hourglass figure are most extensively found in Europe.
 

Rocky

Regular
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
1,622
Reputation
1
They aren't paedormophic. They just lack secondary sex traits and mentality. All of the dom phenotypes were killed off since their civilization is so old.
 
Top