90 degree ramus in motion

Harbinger

Normie
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,252
Reputation
2
90 degree gonial isn't good because it makes your face square. Ideal is 115.
 
Joined
Nov 19, 2015
Messages
4,258
Reputation
5
He's probably skinny as fuck and his face still looks full. He'd look legit obese facewise if he had high-normal bf% imo.
Square face without cheek hollows = death.
 

Ocho

Incel
Joined
Nov 10, 2015
Messages
201
Reputation
0
lol perfectly square jaws are not ideal.  they look ridiculous and not aesthetically pleasing.  plus, having a square jaw from the front doesn't mean it has to be 90 gonial angle from the side.  like this guy, it looks stupid because because his face just flares out to the side.  someone with an angle of 115-128 looks best because it is still square but the face is more contoured upwards because of the angle.  It thins the face out a bit and doesn't look ridiculously boxy
 

dogboner54

Slayer
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
2,182
Reputation
5
Ocho said:
lol perfectly square jaws are not ideal.  they look ridiculous and not aesthetically pleasing.  plus, having a square jaw from the front doesn't mean it has to be 90 gonial angle from the side.  like this guy, it looks stupid because because his face just flares out to the side.  someone with an angle of 115-128 looks best because it is still square but the face is more contoured upwards because of the angle.  It thins the face out a bit and doesn't look ridiculously boxy
:clap:



check sig for ideal jaw
 

Drake

Normie
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
1,780
Reputation
1
:jordan:

id rather have a 8/10 front and a 5/10 side profile thanks
 
Top