mrz's friends and enemies

[dat feel]

Convicted sex offender with NO NOSE is arrested for child pornography

[img=154x0]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/14/20/4D3CF59900000578-0-image-m-9_1529002869315.jpg[/img]


House voice votes to BAN shipments of CHILD sex dolls and robots as they 'normalize sex between adults and minors'

[img=154x0]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/14/22/4D3DC50700000578-0-image-a-91_1529010307467.jpg[/img]

[fuckgoebbelz]

Yes ban all things that serve as substitutes for raping children based on the complete lack of evidence that such things cause more children to be sexually abused. The Supreme Court of the United States needs to start standing up on behalf of the constitution of the United States and ceasing from allowing the Sex Cult to enforce their religious beliefs against society. The hysteria that some individuals have in relation to these matters can play out in the confines of constitutional law, which must be upheld and enforced against them. If the supreme court of the United States is incapable of upholding constitutional law in the United States due to the prevalence of belief in the Sex Cult, it is time for a war against the United States in which justices of the supreme court are removed from the bench until such time that they are replaced by those with allegiance to the constitution of the United States.

Enough of this hysterical movement of whack jobs enforcing their fucking religious establishment onto broader society. It is time to strip them of their unconstitutional power that has illegally been granted to them by congress. The failure for this to manifest is going to necessitate that judges of the United States begin being murdered off the bench, rather than allowed to continue subverting the constitution.

Seriously, the time to strip this movement of their illegal power has long since passed. If the judges of the United States are incapable of maintaining the rule of constitutional law in the face of this movement of charlatans then it is time for the judges of the United States to start dying in retaliation to their treason. The Sex Cult is a fucking establishment of religion, science has refuted their belief system, they are simply hysterical individuals undergoing psychotic decompensation. I am fully invoking the establishment clause against them, and I fully demand for the justices of the United States to operate in the confines of the constitutional law of the United States of America, and I fully endorse killing the ones who operate in subversion of the constitution.

The Sex Cult is properly classified as a 20th century establishment of religion. I am in the utmost sincerity invoking the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution against every single action that the United States government has taken based on their belief in the folklore of this 20th century religious establishment. I support killing the agents of the United States government who are committing treason against the constitution by subverting the rule of constitutional law in respect of the believers in this 20th century religious establishment.

[fuckgoebbelz]

If the constitution is not immediately enforced against the 20th century religious establishments, the proper response is to begin identifying the judges that believe in them and murdering them off the bench. There is no legal obligation to allow these insane individuals to subvert the rule of constitutional law in this nation. It is morally acceptable to kill judges who believe in the 20th century religious establishments, as their mental illness is causing them to subvert the rule of constitutional law in this nation. The beliefs of the 20th century religious establishments have been refuted, they have no legal validity in a secular nation, they are religious establishments and they have no evidence in support of them. Their laws are invalid and without legal merit, and it is obligatory for the justices of the United States to stop sitting by and allowing these movements to violate the constitution. If the current justices of the United States are incapable of upholding the rule of constitutional law, it is time to replace them in the most efficient manner possible, including blowing their heads off their shoulders until such time that they are replaced by those without affliction by this religious psychosis.

It is intolerable to continue being illegally and unconstitutionally subjected to the terrorism of these psychotic religious terrorists who believe in these fucking make believe fantasy worlds. The justices of the United States will be upholding the constitution and neutralizing the illegal power of these religious establishments, or they will die for their treason. It is not optional for the justices of the United States to strip these movements of their power, it is obligatory and their failure to manifest their constitutional mandate is simply an act of subversive treason for which they must be killed out of their positions of power.

The Sex Hysteria of this nation is motherfucking over and done with. Constitutional law is being restored to the United States of America, because the justices of the United States who believe otherwise are going to be fucking murdered off the bench until such time that they are replaced by those with allegiance to the constitution rather than those with allegiance to the shared state of schizophrenic psychotic decompensation of the 20th century religious establishments.

Neutralize the illegal power of the 20th century religious establishments or die. The believers in the 20th century religious establishments should be killed on sight until such time that their religious establishments are stripped of their illegal power which congress has unconstitutionally granted to them such that they could wage their war of terror against the disbelievers in their fiction materials.

There is no obligation in the United States of America to be subjected to the terrorism of the religiously insane. It is time to start killing the religiously insane individuals in the United States political and legal establishment until the collapse of their theocracy.

[fuckgoebbelz]

This is not a matter for continued debate. This is not a matter to wait and see. Immediately the justices of the United States are to demonstrate the rule of constitutional law in this nation. There is no time to wait. They will immediately be enforcing the constitution of this nation against the religiously insane, their failure to immediately voluntarily demonstrate that the United States of America is still a constitutional nation, demands immediately killing the religiously insane members of the United States of America. They are treasonously subverting the rule of constitutional law because of their belief in scientifically refuted make believe fantasy worlds. Your make believe fantasy world has been disproved and is an establishment of religion and is in violation of the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution. You have no legal authority in this nation, the fact that you ever had any authority in this nation was a mistake that must immediately be corrected.

The time for talking is not going to last indefinitely. The time for explaining what has happened is not an indefinite time period. The time for talking will quickly transition into the time to start killing the treasonous subversive insurgents who believe their religious beliefs are exempt from constitutional law. These movements have been motherfucking refuted by science, they are fucking 20th century religious establishments, and they must immediately be neutralized. They cannot be allowed for a second longer to continue on in this nation. It is obligatory for the justices of the United States to immediately declare these movements in violation of the constitution. This is not something that can happen tomorrow, or next week, or next year, this needs to happen immediately. The justices of the United States must immediately uphold their constitutional obligations and cease and desist from granting exceptions to the constitution to these mentally ill terrorists. If the justices of the United States do not do this, the answer is to begin murdering the believers until enough of them are dead to abolish their laws. There will be no complacency as these 20th century religious establishments violate the law and the constitution in this nation. There will not be individuals complaining about the continued subversion of the constitution, there will be individuals identifying the traitors and murdering them off the bench.

In history there is absolutely no doubt that this movement will be seen as a fucking abomination. The time to end this abomination is immediately. It is long past time to disregard the horseshit of these psychotic religious terrorists and to inform them that they live in a constitutional nation and that there is no exception to the constitution of this nation for their religious psychosis. This must immediately manifest, every single justice of the United States must immediately declare these laws unconstitutional, refuse to hear cases regarding these laws, and declare them unconstitutional in whichever manner possible. The justices of the United States who continue allowing these unconstitutional laws to persist such that these psychotic terrorists can continue waging their war against those who don't believe in their scientifically refuted fiction materials that describe their make believe fantasy world that provably does not exist, are treasonous and it is time to start fighting against the treasonous subversion of the rule of law in this nation.

I endorse the military stepping in on this matter and bringing this nation back under the control of constitutional law. The local political establishment is clearly incapable of managing itself, I have a complete and total lack of faith and trust in this government to such an extent that I sincerely call on the United States military to regain control of this nation. The United States constitution is being subverted by internally operating agents, the political and legal establishment has demonstrated their inability to resist this treasonous subversion, and therefore it is now up to the military to protect the citizens of the United States from the terrorism of the believers in these 20th century religious establishments.

[fuckgoebbelz]

The Sex Cult doesn't care about any amount of scientific evidence because the Sex Cult is a 20th century religious establishment and the adherents to the Sex Cult are religiously insane schizophrenics:

Some scientist are actually claiming that child sex dolls may reduce pedophilia.

'To the contrary, these dolls create a real risk of reinforcing pedophilic behavior and they desensitize the user causing him to engage in sicker and sicker behavior,' Goodlatte stated.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...cally.html

Religious people 'cling to certain beliefs' even when they contradict evidence because they are overly emotional and irrational, study claims

The Sex Cult is a 20th century religious establishment. There can be absolutely zero humoring of their religious establishment. Every single justice of the United States who is not religiously insane needs to adopt a zero tolerance policy for them. There is no compromise to be had with them, their laws are simply in violation of the constitution. Declare them unconstitutional tolerate them to absolutely zero extent they are mentally ill religious terrorists who believe in a fucking make believe fantasy world that has been proven as make believe. There is no need to continue humoring them, just fucking declare them unconstitutional. There is no debate to be had on the matter, their religion has been disproved and their defective brains are rendering them incapable of updating their belief systems to take this information into account.

The Sex Cult believes in a make believe fantasy world that has absolutely no presence in the state of actual reality. The Sex Cult consists of individuals undergoing socially convergent anosognosic psychotic decompensation:

http://www.faceofmalawi.com/2017/07/reli...ist-warns/

The self-described atheist, who is also a neuroendocrinologist, argues that religion is comparable to a shared schizophrenia.

The Sex Cult is a 20th century religious establishment and the laws of the Sex Cult are in violation of the first amendment of the constitution of the United States. It is literally time to start identifying the judges who believe in the Sex Cult and putting bullets into their heads as they are subverting the rule of constitutional law in this nation in respect of their religious establishment.

[fuckgoebbelz]

Seriously, every single piece of dogma of this religious establishment has been proven as make believe. Their entire belief system is just a shared delusional system. Nothing they believe has evidence in support of it, it's all just baseless assertions. Their entire belief system has been refuted by science, they believe in fucking mythology, superstition, pseudoscience, they have created an enormous themed make believe fantasy world that has no correlation to anything in the state of actual existence, and their brains are prohibiting them from escaping from this enormous collection of make believe bullshit. They are literally, 100%, a 20th century religious establishment, and it is absolutely obligatory for the United States to stop excepting this religious establishment from the first amendment of the constitution.

Seriously, if these religious terrorists do not have the rule of constitutional law upheld against them it is going to necessitate that people start dying toward it. There will either be a peaceful situation in which the justices of the United States accept that this movement is a societal disease of mentally ill individuals and take immediate and strong measures to provide redress for the history of constitutional violations they have engaged in based on their belief in this religious establishment, or there will be a situation that demands violence is used against the representatives of the United States who are causing this to not manifest due to their religious belief in this themed collection of fiction materials. The religiously insane believers in themed collections of fiction materials are no longer going to pose a threat to the sane individuals of this nation, without the retaliation for this being religiously insane justices of this nation being gunned the fuck down.

It is time to accept, that this movement is fucking fraudulent. Their entire belief system is just a shared delusional state, it has no presence in the state of actual reality. They are properly classified as a 20th century religious establishment, they have their own mythology, their own superstitions, their neural activity is manifesting the patterns of religiosity, there is an overwhelming case to be made for the Sex Cult being a 20th century religious establishment, and it is obligatory for this religious establishment to be constrained by the first amendment of the constitution. Seriously, if the justices of the United States are intent on continuing to except this religious establishment from the first amendment of the constitution, it will leave no option other than beginning to murder the believers off the bench, because the disbelievers in the themed collections of fiction materials of the religious terrorists of the United States are not going to be trampled to death by the schizophrenic fucks who believe these make believe fantasy worlds are actual reality. These individuals do not have an association with actual reality, they are dissociated into a make believe fantasy world that has no presence in the physical existence. Their religion has been disproved by science, their religion is not real, their religion can no longer be granted special status in this nation without the response to this being people in the government being murdered in retaliation.

[DerockCarpetwater]

[dat feel]

i used to think that maybe mrz is just some kind of law enforcement honeypot

but it seems like he's an actual real person who writes these walls of text and legitimately defends cp


i don't know if it's even possible to make him step out of the cave

[fuckgoebbelz]

The judges of the United States who continue in allowing for this treason to manifest must be identified and murdered off the bench toward the restoration of constitutional law in this nation. Your religious establishment has been conclusively disproved, your continued belief in it is a manifestation of religious psychosis and the act of the United States government respecting your religious delusions is in violation of the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution. Your religious belief system has absolutely no ability to be codified into the laws of this nation, and if the presence of the laws of this religious establishment is not abolished in accordance with the constitution the proper response is to identify and murder the treasonous justices of this nation who are subverting the constitution in respect of their belief in this make believe fantasy world.

Your inability to update your beliefs in accordance with evidence is not the problem of those with modern functional brains. If you are not stripped of your power by the enforcement of the constitution, it demands murdering the judges of this nation who are religiously insane. Your defective brains are not an excuse for your violations of the constitution of this nation. If you cannot come to terms with your mental illness, so long as you have a presence in the courts of this nation you need a target on your head.

The Sex Cult is a 20th century establishment of religion based on the psychotic belief in a make believe fantasy world described in a themed collection of fiction materials. The individuals who believe in the Sex Cult are undergoing socially convergent anosognosic psychotic decompensation and are properly classified as religiously insane. Whoever needs to die to strip the power from this religious establishment should be dead already.

[dat feel]

lol if you think protecting children has anything to do with religion

even the most rabid atheists would find anti-cp measures reasonable

[fuckgoebbelz]

lol if you think protecting children has anything to do with religion

even the most rabid atheists would find anti-cp measures reasonable

The Sex Cult is a 20th century atheistic religion that consists of a themed make believe fantasy world that has been refuted by the scientific evidence and investigative procedures. The Sex Cult is a religion without any particular gods, though they did originate from the belief in satanic ritual sex abuse and arguably have Abrahamic roots. The modern Sex Cult is substantially removed from its Abrahamic origins however, and is a unique 20th century religion that does not require the belief in gods.

The scientific evidence has demonstrated that the beliefs of the Sex Cult are false. They believe in a stereotyped make believe fantasy world that has absolutely no evidence in support of its legitimacy and which has been refuted by the scientific evidence. For example, this is a common belief of the Sex Cult:

https://www.pathtojustice.com/blog/masha...y-victims/

Therefore, as these graphic sexual images populate and spread, we can unfortunately predict there will be more child sexual abuse.

This is one of the numerous stereotyped assertions made by the believers in the Sex Cult, and it has been refuted by the scientific evidence just as all of their other beliefs:

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/...-1042321-0

Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children

http://unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV204%20CP%20possessors.pdf

One concern is that the accessibility of online CP has caused increases in child
sexual abuse. Some research suggests that CP may trigger sexual abuse by activating
and validating sexual urges in CP viewers that were previously suppressed or con-
trolled (Beech et al., 2008; Quayle & Taylor, 2003; Wilson & Jones, 2008). There is no
evidence of increasing abuse in the United States, however. In fact, rates of child sexual
abuse have declined substantially since the mid-1990s, a time period that corresponds
to the spread of CP online. Statistics from U.S. child protective service agencies show
that from 1992 to 2007, child sexual abuse declined 53% (Jones & Finkelhor, 2009),
including interfamilial abuse (Finkelhor & Jones, 2006). Evidence of this decline also
comes from victim self-report surveys and U.S. criminal justice system data (Finkelhor
& Jones, 2008; Finkelhor, Turner, Ormrod, & Hamby, 2010), as well as the child pro-
tective services data collection system. The fact that this trend is revealed in multiple
sources tends to undermine arguments that it is because of reduced reporting or changes
in investigatory or statistical procedures.

Despite being refuted by the scientific evidence, the believers in the Sex Cult continue stating this falsity over and over again. Their inability to comprehend that their religious belief system has been scientifically refuted is due to their religious psychosis:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...cally.html

Religious people 'cling to certain beliefs' even when they contradict evidence because they are overly emotional and irrational, study claims

They are manifesting socially convergent anosognosic psychotic decompensation:

http://www.faceofmalawi.com/2017/07/reli...ist-warns/

The self-described atheist, who is also a neuroendocrinologist, argues that religion is comparable to a shared schizophrenia.

They are incapable of processing this matter with their evolutionarily recent neural networking as the socioculturally pertinent stimuli is causing it to deactivate:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805169/

Finally, we have demonstrated that attention to engaging social stimuli not only activates the DMN but also deactivates the TPN. In a subsequent study[30] it was shown that this pattern of DMN activation and TPN deactivation was present for humanizing depictions of individuals, whereas dehumanizing depictions, which are associated with decreased moral concern, either involved decreased activity in the DMN or increased activity in the TPN. Taken together, these findings suggest that we are neurologically constrained from simultaneously exercising moral concern and analytic thinking.

A manifestation of anosognosia:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140620/

Anosognosia in Schizophrenia: Hidden in Plain Sight
...
“I don’t need medicine—there is nothing wrong with me. I just came here for a check-up.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140620/

The results showed a correlation between insight as measured by the BCIS self-reflectiveness index and lower gray matter volume in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). The VLPFC is involved in working memory and decision making. The findings suggest that a reduced VLPFC volume corresponds with a diminished capacity to entertain alternative explanations about one’s misperceptions leading to impairment in awareness of illness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactio...28vlPFC.29

The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) is a subdivision of the prefrontal cortex. Its involvement in modulating existing behavior and emotional output given contextual demands has been studied extensively using cognitive reappraisal studies and emotion-attention tasks. Cognitive reappraisal studies indicate the vlFPC’s role in reinterpreting stimuli, and reducing or augmenting responses. Studies using emotion-attention tasks demonstrate the vlFPC’s function in ignoring emotional distractions while the brain is engaged in performing other tasks.[6]

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/154f/9a...b09f17.pdf

System 1 has been variously characterized as 'intuitive', 'emotion-driven' and 'experiential'; whereas System 2 has been characterized as, 'controlled', 'rule-based', 'rational' and 'analytic'. We know of two lines of work which link cognitive neuroscience to this classical form of dual process theory:one which looks at logical reasoning (Goel and Dolan, 2003), the other moral judgments (Greene et al., 2004). Both identify areas in the DMN and TPN associated with System 1 and System 2 reasoning respectively. Hence, the link between dual-process theories of cognition and the DMN vs.TPN dichotomy appears worthy of further investigation.

The Sex Cult is a 20th century New Religious Movement. It is obligatory for the United States to constrain it by the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution. Currently, the United States is violating the constitutional rights of those who do not believe in this religious establishment:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/taboo...-qcxjfxs82

Most controversially, he believes society needs to tackle the taboo subject of ASD and paedophilia. Speaking ahead of World Autism Awareness Day today, he suggested that many inmates in sex offender units, including those convicted of child pornography offences, show signs of Asperger’s or ASD.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism

ASD-related patterns of low function and aberrant activation in the brain differ depending on whether the brain is doing social or nonsocial tasks.[97] In autism there is evidence for reduced functional connectivity of the default network, a large-scale brain network involved in social and emotional processing, with intact connectivity of the task-positive network, used in sustained attention and goal-directed thinking. In people with autism the two networks are not negatively correlated in time, suggesting an imbalance in toggling between the two networks, possibly reflecting a disturbance of self-referential thought.[98]

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/my-...r-or-apart

Religion and Autism, are they together or apart?
Recent studies suggest today's autistics tend to reject organized religion.

The Sex Cult has been conclusively disproved by the scientific and investigative procedures. The inability of the believers to update their reality models in response to this evidence is due to their anosognosia which arises from their socially convergent schizophrenic psychotic decompensation that is why they are an establishment of religion. It is obligatory for the United States to constrain the Sex Cult by the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution, the failure for this to manifest demands the identifications and murders of the justices of the United States who are subverting the rule of constitutional law due to their belief in this 20th century religious establishment.

[dat feel]

mrz it is sad that you dedicated your considerable brainpower and intellectual capacity to the service of such an ignoble mission

it's quite impressive that you're able to come up with these walls of text, which I must say, follow a cohesive logical pattern, though it's ultimately flawed

maybe your position on the spectrum genuinely prevents you from differentiating between good and evil, in which case nothing can be done about it

you could be a good person though

[fuckgoebbelz]

You have a lower stage of moral development:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_K...nventional

Conventional

The conventional level of moral reasoning is typical of adolescents and adults. To reason in a conventional way is to judge the morality of actions by comparing them to society's views and expectations. The conventional level consists of the third and fourth stages of moral development. Conventional morality is characterized by an acceptance of society's conventions concerning right and wrong. At this level an individual obeys rules and follows society's norms even when there are no consequences for obedience or disobedience. Adherence to rules and conventions is somewhat rigid, however, and a rule's appropriateness or fairness is seldom questioned.[7][8][9]

Post-conventional
The post-conventional level, also known as the principled level, is marked by a growing realization that individuals are separate entities from society, and that the individual's own perspective may take precedence over society's view; individuals may disobey rules inconsistent with their own principles. Post-conventional moralists live by their own ethical principles—principles that typically include such basic human rights as life, liberty, and justice. People who exhibit post-conventional morality view rules as useful but changeable mechanisms—ideally rules can maintain the general social order and protect human rights. Rules are not absolute dictates that must be obeyed without question. Because post-conventional individuals elevate their own moral evaluation of a situation over social conventions, their behavior, especially at stage six, can be confused with that of those at the pre-conventional level.

You are confusing cultural beliefs for morality. Your beliefs regarding good and evil are like the beliefs of an Indian who kills someone for eating beef:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/muslim-man-di...23541.html

A Muslim man has died after he was attacked by hundreds of vigilantes while transporting cows in India, police said Wednesday, as tensions rose over the slaughter of an animal Hindus consider sacred.

No arrests have yet been made, but police said they had registered a murder case over 55-year-old Pehlu Khan's death in hospital on Monday, two days after a mob attacked his cattle truck on a highway in Alwar in the western state of Rajasthan.

At least six more people were injured when the truck was attacked by around 200 Hindu vigilantes, who police are still trying to identify.

But police also said they were preparing a case against the survivors of the attack, whom they suspect of trying to smuggle the cattle across state borders.

Cows are considered sacred in Hindu-majority India, where squads of vigilantes roam highways inspecting livestock trucks for any trace of the animal.

Like Nazi's exterminating Jews:

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1...s=true&

This article discusses the rationale of Nazi ethics and the moral conditioning of Nazi perpetrators aimed at developing a kind of “ethnic conscience” which restricted moral obligations to members of their own race community. It reconstructs how the universal ethics of humanism got turned upside down and replaced with the particularistic selective racial ethics and the pragmatics of eugenics and racial exterminatory politics. Traditional values regarding human life, based on the idea of its unconditional worth, were replaced by the distinction between life worthy of being promoted and life unworthy of being lived. It shows how ordinary Germans became willing executioners of criminal and immoral deeds. Neither did they act without any moral orientation nor in the awareness that what they were doing was morally reprehensible. As perpetrators with a clear conscience they were convinced that the humiliation, persecution, deportation and, finally, killing of the Jews was the right thing to do.

Like religious terrorists killing the disbelievers:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...103017.htm

While more empathy may sound desirable, untempered empathy can be dangerous, Jack said. "Terrorists, within their bubble, believe it's a highly moral thing they're doing. They believe they are righting wrongs and protecting something sacred."

All of these individuals think that those who disagree with what they are doing are failing to make sound moral judgements. They think not killing individuals for eating beef is a failure of morality. They think not turning in Jews is a failure of morality. They think not suicide bombing civilians is a failure of moral judgement.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...151838.htm

"These findings," Friedman continued, "are consistent with the philosophical view, espoused by (Immanuel) Kant, according to which there are two distinct types of truth: empirical and moral."

It is not empirical truth and moral truth, it is the truth of actual reality and the cultural truth. The cultural truth as it deviates from the truth of actual reality is simply a shared state of schizophrenic psychotic decompensation:

http://www.faceofmalawi.com/2017/07/reli...ist-warns/

The self-described atheist, who is also a neuroendocrinologist, argues that religion is comparable to a shared schizophrenia.

https://philarchive.org/archive/VANRCA-8

In this paper, I examine the relationship between social cognition and religious cognition. Many
cognitive theories of religion claim that these two forms are somehow related, but the details are
usually left unexplored and insights from theories of social cognition are not taken on board.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/obse...eir-lives/

Some experts theorize that certain schizophrenia symptoms (for instance, paranoia) arise in part from a hyperactive sense of social reasoning. “I’d guess that they’d give lots of teleological answers; more than neurotypical people, and certainly far more than people with Asperger’s,” Heywood says.

You are confusing not having your socially shared state of psychotic decompensation as being immoral. It is immorality in the confines of a shared delusional system, but not immoral in actual reality. Do you think it is immoral to not turn in Jews? It was immoral by the cultural truth of Nazi Germany. Do you think it is immoral to eat a hamburger? It is immoral by the cultural truth of many parts of India. Do you think it is immoral to post pictures of Muhammed? In parts of the middle east you will be killed for such a moral transgression. Your beliefs regarding these matters are no different. In your culture mythos it is immoral, but your cultural mythos is based on a shared state of psychotic decompensation, outside of the confines of your delusional imagination these things are not as they have been characterized by your society. Your society believes these things are immoral because they were misled by the Sex Cult into thinking the Sex Cult was telling them about actual reality, but the Sex Cult was telling them about a make believe fantasy world. Your society judges these things in the context of a make believe fantasy world that is not descriptive of actual reality. The lack of belief in your make believe fantasy world leads to actions that are immoral in the confines of it but which are fine in actual reality. You deactivate your evolutionarily modern cognition's neural substrate when contemplating these matters:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4805169/

Finally, we have demonstrated that attention to engaging social stimuli not only activates the DMN but also deactivates the TPN. In a subsequent study[30] it was shown that this pattern of DMN activation and TPN deactivation was present for humanizing depictions of individuals, whereas dehumanizing depictions, which are associated with decreased moral concern, either involved decreased activity in the DMN or increased activity in the TPN. Taken together, these findings suggest that we are neurologically constrained from simultaneously exercising moral concern and analytic thinking.

You contemplate these matters with your default mode network and according to your default mode network you are making sound moral judgements, but your default mode network is not phenomenologically associated with actual reality, it's dissociated in a socially convergent state of psychotic decompensation.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39589

Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence
...
Challenges to political beliefs produced increased activity in the default mode network—a set of interconnected structures associated with self-representation and disengagement from the external world.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140620/

The DMN is involved with processes of self-reflection, social cognition, and mind-wandering. Hyperconnectivity has been noted in the DMN of individuals at high risk for developing schizophrenia.

Whitfield-Gabrieli et al39 studied patients with schizophrenia; young, at-risk, first-degree relatives; and unaffected controls using fMRI during alternating conditions of wakeful rest and a focused working memory task. While the unaffected controls showed predictable deactivation of DMN during active task, the patients and relatives showed diminished deactivation, as well as greater activity in right DLPFC. This finding has essentially been replicated twice by two other research groups.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4140620/

The results showed a correlation between insight as measured by the BCIS self-reflectiveness index and lower gray matter volume in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). The VLPFC is involved in working memory and decision making. The findings suggest that a reduced VLPFC volume corresponds with a diminished capacity to entertain alternative explanations about one’s misperceptions leading to impairment in awareness of illness.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/154f/9a...b09f17.pdf

System 1 has been variously characterized as 'intuitive', 'emotion-driven' and 'experiential'; whereas System 2 has been characterized as, 'controlled', 'rule-based', 'rational' and 'analytic'. We know of two lines of work which link cognitive neuroscience to this classical form of dual process theory:one which looks at logical reasoning (Goel and Dolan, 2003), the other moral judgments (Greene et al., 2004). Both identify areas in the DMN and TPN associated with System 1 and System 2 reasoning respectively. Hence, the link between dual-process theories of cognition and the DMN vs.TPN dichotomy appears worthy of further investigation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14633423

The author tries to differentiate intuitive imagination from delusional imagination and hypothesises that psychosis alters the system of intuitive thinking, which consequently cannot develop in a dynamic and selective way.
...
In the analysis of psychotic patients it is very important to analyse the delusional imagination which dominates the personality and continuously transforms the mental state, twisting emotional truth. The delusional imagination is so deeply rooted in the patient's mental functioning that, even after systematic analysis, the delusional world, which had seemed to disappear, re-emerges under new configurations. The psychotic core remains encapsulated; it produces unsteadiness and may induce further psychotic states in the patient.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_process_theory

System 2 in humans

System 2 is evolutionarily recent and specific to humans. It is also known as the explicit system, the rule-based system, the rational system,[12] or the analytic system.[16] It performs the more slow and sequential thinking. It is domain-general, performed in the central working memory system.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1...3.10746548

activity in the DMN is strongly associated with mental imagery that is not directly tied to current perception (“stimulus-independent thought”), which is also a central feature of dreams.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication..._Psychosis

To summarize, the empirical findings reviewed here constitute
neurobiological evidence of the theoretical idea that dreaming
indeed might serve as a model of psychosis: cortical, in particular
prefrontal, medial parietal and inferior temporal regions that are
linked to insight problems in psychosis show striking overlap with
brain regions in which activation increases during dreaming are
associated with the gain of insight into the current state of mind
(see Fig. 3). From a network point of view, schizophrenia patients
show disconnectivity within the frontoparietal network and
stronger connectivity within the default mode network
[79,80], with the exception of default mode network regions implicated in
self-referential processing, within which patients with poor insight
show decreased connectivity [56].

[fuckgoebbelz]

Seriously the Sex Cult is a fucking religion. They have a stereotyped collection of utterances, myths, superstitions, pseudoscience, and so forth, which they cannot distinguish from actual reality regardless of how much evidence demonstrates that they are essentially mentally ill. They believe they are combating a booming supply demand driven multi billion dollar CP industry that has never existed, protecting children from feeling magically raped all over again, reducing the child sexual abuse rate due to both the supply demand driven nature of the child sexual abuse rate as well as a host of other things, in a collection of pseudoscience that has been refuted by academia, and so on. They have an entire themed fantasy world, and have done so going back to the time when the media reported on the delusions of schizophrenics as if they were actually real. This is seriously an early look at the modern day Sex Cult:

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenti...eb87dc579b

In 1983, Judy Johnson, of California, accused a teacher at her son’s preschool of raping him, said faculty members had sex with animals and even claimed the teacher could fly.

Johnson was hospitalised with paranoid schizophrenia and died before the end of the preliminary hearing from problems related to alcoholism. But LA’s Children’s Institute International then interviewed several hundred children about the alleged incident.

The students were coerced through suggestive interview techniques into making bizarre claims including the existence of secret tunnels under the school in which the alleged abuse took place; orgies supposedly conducted in car washes and airports; disturbing games in which children were allegedly photographed nude; mutilation of corpses; blood drinking; baby sacrifice and a flying teacher.

Pazder was consulted by the prosecution as an expert on Satanic ritual abuse and corroborated the claims. All parties in the McMartin preschool trial were acquitted of all charges in 1990.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/06/23/satanic-panic/

At trial, Dr. Noblitt testified about the existence of cults using ritual abuse and of organized satanic networks engaged in wide-ranging criminal enterprises including child abuse. The picture painted by Dr. Noblitt in his testimony at trial is one where criminal cults are common across the United States, and that these alleged cults typically engage in torture and murder of both adults and children. Furthermore, Dr. Noblitt opined that these cults are experts in a form of mind control or brainwashing in which victims are so heavily traumatized that they develop total and complete amnesia until the victim enters therapy and recovers the memory. His descriptions of these cults involved rape, murder, torture, grave robbing, and ceremonial animal and human sacrifice. Furthermore, he alleged that these activities took place at churches, involved police officers and other professional individuals. Lurid media coverage of this issue at the time additionally invoked the specter of widespread cannibalism. In order to explain the lack of physical evidence for these outrageous crimes, Dr. Noblitt explained to the jury that these cults will frequently lead their victims to believe in something preposterous, so that if they ever told of their tortures the stories would involve elements that would be so far-fetched that the victims would necessarily be disbelieved. This, according to Dr. Noblitt, was done intentionally by the cults as part of the mind control programming in order to discredit their victims.

In an interview shortly after the trial in a local newspaper, Dr. Noblitt was described as having been the prosecution expert witness in many ritual abuse cases, including the Keller case (Dickinson, 1993). He stated in that interview that Dan Keller, while in court, used a mysterious hand signal to mind-control people within the courtroom. Further, he asserted that cults use severe torture on victims and that all memory of the torture is repressed. In a direct quote from this news article, Dr. Noblitt stated: “I believe they use a technique of mind control unknown in legitimate psychology. It’s akin to hypnosis, created through abuse…the state of shock is so severe that it sends the victim into a deep trance state. Then cult members use different signals or triggers…” to control the victims.

https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/14/nyreg...ogram.html

A 1979 profile in New York magazine quoted Mayor Edward I. Koch as saying that she was ''one of those seminal forces, original, a go-getter.'' He said there were ''few people who can claim as many accomplishments.''

Dr. Densen-Gerber's success at getting government help became her downfall when the state investigated her use of public funds in the early 1980's and found irregularities. She resigned as executive director of Odyssey House in 1983, but remained active in affiliated programs.

Her influence extended to areas like child pornography. In 1977, her testimony that there were 264 monthly publications devoted to the subject helped persuade the House of Representatives to unanimously pass a bill to regulate it.

IPT, the publication of the Institute for Psychological Therapy, reported in 1992 that later government investigations proved her estimates to be exaggerated by ''several orders of magnitude.''

Dr. Densen-Gerber also commented on many other hot issues from a psychiatric point of view.

In 1991, she went to Omaha to testify in court that her interview with a man convinced her he had witnessed four satanic ritual killings. She characterized herself as an expert at deprogramming survivors of satanic cults.

https://psmag.com/satan-has-no-interest-...adc0fc26d8

Victorian-style devil outrage reached a fever pitch in the family-values 1980s. In his 2015 book We Believe the Children: A Moral Panic in the 1980s, author Richard Beck tells the story of a series of allegations of ritualized Satanic child abuse in daycare centers around the country. Through painstaking elicitation, police, prosecutors, and investigators managed to get children to testify to all sorts of unthinkable violations. Not just sexual assault: There were allegations of gamified animal torture and vast networks of child porn production and distribution. And, of course, the devil.

I asked Beck if in all his exhaustive research he had been able to track down a single instance of verified Satanic ritual child abuse. “No,” says. “My editor and I joked that the book would sell better if I could find an actual case, but as far as I could find it never happened.” Since they didn’t occur in reality, the infernal elements had to be products of adult interpretation and suggestion. Yet whole municipalities managed to convince themselves that there were hidden networks of devil worship and child abuse in their own backyards. How did they accomplish such a feat?

These individuals have been abusing the government of the United States to engage in their psychotic crusade for decades now:

ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume4/j4_2_1.htm

The Origin of the Myths

In 1976 Robin Lloyd, correspondent for NBC, published For Money or Love: Boy Prostitution in America (Out of Print)(Out of Print).18 In the book, for which a U.S. senator had written an introduction, Lloyd claimed that a huge network of prostitution involving 300,000 boys existed. The notion that child pornography trade is big business was initiated in this book. Yet, nowhere in the book is there any empirical basis for the number 300,000. Indeed, Lloyd admitted that it was a working hypothesis which he had suggested to a number of experts to test their reactions.19 This didn't prevent Judianne Densen-Gerber, director of Odyssey House, a chain of residential treatment clinics for drug addicts, from taking over the figure as if it represented a reliable statistic. She set about to mobilize public opinion against child pornography to which, she said, Lloyd had alerted her.

The media followed the stories of child exploitation in detail. In the national periodicals during 1977 nine articles appeared.20 The New York Times, a paper known to avoid sensationalism, printed 27 articles that year compared to one in the two years before. When in May, 1977 the highly popular television series Sixty Minutes devoted a program to child pornography, a tidal wave of letters to politicians resulted.21 That spring a subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives held a series of hearings on the subject which lasted until autumn, keeping child pornography in the news in the U.S.A. A platform was established by crusaders against child pornography, and in the prevailing climate of moral panic their cries for stronger measures received wide political support.

The chairman of the committee was Representative John Conyers Jr., who had organized the hearings to pass judgment on the proposal of Representatives Kildee and Murphy for a first Federal law against child pornography. It was this series of hearings that would make the question of child pornography a national issue. The first hearing was dominated by the appearance of Judianne Densen-Gerber. Equipped. with some child pornography magazines, she shocked congressional representatives with her claim that she had, together with Robin Lloyd, counted 264 comparable publications that, according to her, appeared monthly (an exaggeration by a factor of several orders of magnitude as we shall see). The figures which Robin Lloyd had mentioned as a working hypothesis were repeated by Densen-Gerber as fact:

Lloyd's book documented the involvement of 300,000 boys, aged 8 to 16, in activities revolving around sex for sale.22

She then multiplied the number by two, because her intuition told her that 300,000 girls were also involved in such activities. She then multiplied it again by two since, according to Lloyd, the real figure was "twice what he (could) statistically validate,"23 and this lead to something like a million children. The chairman Conyers multiplied this again by two since, he reasoned, America had not only one million runaways but another one million school drop outs. In this way the contours of a national disaster were drawn. According to Conyers:

"So we have somewhere possibly in the neighbourhood of 2 million kids who form a ready market for sexual exploitation from pornographers and the like."24

Densen-Gerber could not agree more. The Kildee-Murphy proposal was made law without any opposition: 401 for, 0 against.

The Spread of Rumors

In 1986 the Senate Commission33 under the chairmanship of William V. Roth, Republican from Delaware, came to the same conclusion as the ILIC report. Nevertheless, neither the Roth report nor the ILIC report were able to dampen the spread of rumors about an enormous trade. Even in 1986, the claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber continued to come up as facts in official reports: the Meese Commission, initiated by the Reagan administration to prepare a drastic sharpening of the anti-pornography laws, uncritically took over these claims.34 According to the Meese Commission, Congress had discovered that child pornography and child prostitution "have become highly organized, multi-million dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."35 The monthly appearance of 264 magazines (Densen-Gerber) was again reported as truth, alongside the 30,000 exploited children of Los Angeles (Lloyd Martin).

The U.S. Supreme Court took over these claims in their first child pornography case, New York v Ferber (1982), saying that child pornography comprised, "highly organized multimillion dollar industries that operate on a nationwide scale."36 The otherwise dignified court was so upset by the alleged extent of the problem that the solicitor for the accused, Herald Price Fahringer, lost his composure and fled the sitting as fast as he could.37

The claims of Lloyd and Densen-Gerber also appeared outside the U.S.A. The report, Exploitation of Child Labour, which was submitted in 1981 to the Commission for Human Rights of the United Nations, claimed: "In the United States there are at least 264 pornographic magazines specializing in pornography concerning children."38 It was claimed that in 1977, 15,000 slides and 4,000 films of child pornography had been intercepted by the police, which was, according to the report, 5% of the total stock in circulation.

According to the United Nations report, the value of trade in child pornography in 1977 was estimated at $500 million. Such estimates are not based on any kind of empirical evidence, and are easy to refute. If these claims were true then the allegedly intercepted slides and films would have had a value of thousands of dollars each.39 In reality, these films were sold for much less, which can be checked with reference to the advertisement brochures of Deltaboek, publisher of homosexual pornography and literature. From here it is apparent that the Golden Boys film series, produced by COQ in Denmark, cost 85 guilders each, which is about $35.

In 1986, Defence for Children International prepared a report on child prostitution in which they claimed: "Estimates on the number of child prostitutes vary from 300,000 to several millions for the U.S. and Canada."40 A year later these figures were taken over by the Norwegian Ministry of Justice.41 This report was later submitted to the Ministers of Justice of the member countries of the Council of Europe. Within the Council of Europe a report on child exploitation was written in which it was claimed that: "A study of boy prostitutes had suggested that there were 300,000 boy prostitutes in the United States, many of whom are designated runaways."42 The claims of the United Nations report were also repeated. As late as 1988 the Dutch language world development magazine, Onze Wereld (Our World), claimed that: "The American (sic) periodical43 Child Abuse and Neglect reported that in the United States at least 264 different child pornography magazines are in circulation. The kiddieporn stars are drawn from the numerous American runaway teenagers."44 The same article made similar exaggerated claims about alleged illicit trade in donor organs obtained from children killed for the purpose. The story about donor organs had also appeared in the report of the Council of Europe, although there was never any evidence and the story was not credible from the beginning.45

The alleged size of the child pornography trade and the many children said to have been involved, are little more than myths. They are the result of the arbitrary multiplication of arbitrary numbers of alleged victims made by a journalist. The claims had taken on a life of their own. The fact that these claims had by 1980 been rejected by thorough official investigations was insufficient to prevent the claim from reappearing, not only in the media but also in other official circles, including the United States Senate, the United States Supreme Court, a Commission of the American Justice Department, the United Nations and the Council of Europe. After the number had been cited in the Hearings of the House of Representatives, it became associated with an ostensibly reliable source. The fact that the original source was anything but reliable was forgotten.

---

These people have never stopped undergoing this psychotic decompensation, and they are as entrenched in the U.N. and the United States government as they have always been. They are still fighting against the mythological booming bazillion dollar CP industry:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32880508/ns/te...increases/

More than 4 million Web sites worldwide show images of children being sexually exploited, said the U.N. investigator on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Najat M'jid Maalla.
....
Maalla urged international cooperation to stop the child pornography industry, which she estimated to be worth between $3 billion and $20 billion. She recommended countries share information on sites containing child pornography in order to block them faster.

http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/art...timony.htm

Congressional estimates put the online child pornography business at $20 billion a year and growing. Online or offline, child pornography is illegal in the United States and most other countries.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/c...03286.html

Some law-enforcement officials contend that disrupting the companies making a profit off child pornography may only be the tip of the iceberg. Matt Dunn, of the Cyber Crimes Center at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau, said that non-commercial child pornography -- images shared without money changing hands -- is more of a concern than the for-profit industry.

Swapping child porn over file-sharing networks is ongoing -- and it's usually non-commercial, Dunn said. "It's happening every second of every day," he said.

Dunn also questions the estimate that commercial child porn is a $20 billion a year industry -- a figure cited in a 2006 congressional hearing -- and instead thinks it's substantially lower, perhaps in the tens of millions of dollars.

Still regurgitating their scientifically refuted hypotheses:

https://www.pathtojustice.com/blog/masha...y-victims/

Therefore, as these graphic sexual images populate and spread, we can unfortunately predict there will be more child sexual abuse.

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/...-1042321-0

Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children

http://unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV204%20CP%20possessors.pdf

One concern is that the accessibility of online CP has caused increases in child
sexual abuse. Some research suggests that CP may trigger sexual abuse by activating
and validating sexual urges in CP viewers that were previously suppressed or con-
trolled (Beech et al., 2008; Quayle & Taylor, 2003; Wilson & Jones, 2008). There is no
evidence of increasing abuse in the United States, however. In fact, rates of child sexual
abuse have declined substantially since the mid-1990s, a time period that corresponds
to the spread of CP online. Statistics from U.S. child protective service agencies show
that from 1992 to 2007, child sexual abuse declined 53% (Jones & Finkelhor, 2009),
including interfamilial abuse (Finkelhor & Jones, 2006). Evidence of this decline also
comes from victim self-report surveys and U.S. criminal justice system data (Finkelhor
& Jones, 2008; Finkelhor, Turner, Ormrod, & Hamby, 2010), as well as the child pro-
tective services data collection system. The fact that this trend is revealed in multiple
sources tends to undermine arguments that it is because of reduced reporting or changes
in investigatory or statistical procedures.

Still saying insane shit at court:

http://fox8.com/2012/05/21/former-pastor...n-charges/

"we hear that in court that they feel like they are victimized every single time someone downloads their videos or looks at their videos they feel like they are being raped all over again,” said Canonico

They are properly classified as a 20th century religious establishment, and it is obligatory for the United States government to constrain them by the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amen...ution#Text

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]

It is illegal for the United States to continue supporting the Sex Cult in any capacity, and it is obligatory for the laws that were passed based on the belief in their make believe fantasy world to be abolished. Judges of the United States who disagree with this are religiously insane and treasonously subverting the rule of constitutional law via illegally enabling terrorism against the disbelievers in this make believe fantasy world, and therefore it is both morally acceptable and imperative to begin murdering them off the bench. There is absolutely no obligation to humor the psychotic decompensation of the religiously insane for a moment longer, their fiction materials have been refuted and it is mandatory for them to be treated in every respect as the 20th century religious establishment they are.

[fuckgoebbelz]

Child Porn is to the religion of the Sex Cult what Cows are to Hindus. Looking at child porn is blasphemy against the religion of the Sex Cult:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

Blasphemy is the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence to a deity, or sacred things, or toward something considered sacred or inviolable.[1][2][3][4]

The laws against looking at child porn are blasphemy laws that congress unconstitutionally passed in respect of a 20th century religious establishment that believes in a stereotyped make believe fantasy world that has been completely refuted by science and investigative procedures.

[ShortMidfaceCel]

Shit thread, kill yourself.

[fuckgoebbelz]

The Sex Cult is essentially identical to the anti vaccination movement:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/dailydose...m.mercury/

Years ago, people made predictions -- by removing thimerosal, the number of cases of autism should decrease -- therefore showing that thimerosal is a cause of autism. This new study puts that idea in jeopardy. Similar studies have been done in Canada and Denmark with the same results: thimerosal was removed, but autism is still on the rise. This is a strong message; it very clearly shows, and reassures, that autism did not arrive through a vaccine.

https://www.pathtojustice.com/blog/masha...y-victims/

Therefore, as these graphic sexual images populate and spread, we can unfortunately predict there will be more child sexual abuse.

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/...-1042321-0

Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children

http://unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV204%20CP%20possessors.pdf

One concern is that the accessibility of online CP has caused increases in child
sexual abuse. Some research suggests that CP may trigger sexual abuse by activating
and validating sexual urges in CP viewers that were previously suppressed or con-
trolled (Beech et al., 2008; Quayle & Taylor, 2003; Wilson & Jones, 2008). There is no
evidence of increasing abuse in the United States, however. In fact, rates of child sexual
abuse have declined substantially since the mid-1990s, a time period that corresponds
to the spread of CP online. Statistics from U.S. child protective service agencies show
that from 1992 to 2007, child sexual abuse declined 53% (Jones & Finkelhor, 2009),
including interfamilial abuse (Finkelhor & Jones, 2006). Evidence of this decline also
comes from victim self-report surveys and U.S. criminal justice system data (Finkelhor
& Jones, 2008; Finkelhor, Turner, Ormrod, & Hamby, 2010), as well as the child pro-
tective services data collection system. The fact that this trend is revealed in multiple
sources tends to undermine arguments that it is because of reduced reporting or changes
in investigatory or statistical procedures.

http://libertus.net/censor/resources/sta...html#s3bfg

"child pornography is one of the fastest growing online businesses generating approximately $US3 billion ($3.43 billion) each year"

This '$US3 billion' figure has no credibility and even if it was factual as at January 2008, (when it appeared in an opinion article by Bernadette McMenamin, CEO of Child Wise/ ECPAT in Australia, with citing a source), then it could be regarded as 'good news' because it would mean (based on previously promulgated 'statistics') that there had been no increase at all in the five years to 2008, therefore 'child pornography' could not be "one of the fastest growing online businesses".

The '$US3 billion' figure has been promulgated far and wide since at least mid 2003, when Utah-based Jerry Ropelato commenced publishing it, without citing a source, on his web site InternetFilterReview.com, which has since become part of his TopTenReviews.com. According to Texas-based Red Orbit News (5 Nov 2006) Ropelato was "formerly chief operating officer of ContentWatch, a Salt Lake City-based developer of Internet filtering and virus protection software. He is also known locally as a speaker and presenter on Internet safety issues, and as a crusader against online pornography."[44]

The "fastest growing online businesses" claim originated with the U.S. NCMEC, in August 2005, which based its claim on the then two-year old US$3 billion 'statistic' promulgated by Ropelato. (The U.S. NCMEC has a long history of promulgating exaggerated/false statistics[45].)

http://jhppl.dukejournals.org/content/37/1/69.short

The last dozen years have seen a massive transnational mobilization of the legal, political, and research communities in response to the worrisome hypothesis that vaccines could have a link to childhood autism and other developmental conditions. Vaccine critics, some already organized and some composed of newly galvanized parents, developed an alternate world of internally legitimating studies, blogs, conferences, publications, and spokespeople to affirm a connection.

As I have noted above, there is indeed a complex community of researchers, journals, and articles to point to, facts to recite, conferences to attend, and professional groups to connect with that supply a great deal of internal legitimacy

https://rsoresearch.files.wordpress.com/...ng_kit.pdf

Nevertheless, Dr. Hernandez privately
distributed his study widely, without peer review or any
other oversight, and thus bypassed normal opportunities for
either scientific validation or refutation by experts in the field
of sexual offender diagnosis and treatment. He distributed his
study to a limited but very receptive audience nationally
(and later internationally, specifically Great Britain), including
law enforcement officials and agencies, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and state
and federal prosecutors.
But it was the policy makers who especially welcomed the
study‘s implications.

http://jaapl.org/content/42/4/404

From both a clinical and an actuarial statistical perspective, an early retrospective study conducted at a Federal Civil Commitment Facility in Butner, North Carolina, inferred an association between accessing child pornography and hands-on sexual offending.3 That study has been criticized regarding its methodology and lack of scientific rigor.4 More recent prospective data have questioned the contention that there is a correlation between accessing child pornography and hands-on offending.5 For example, one such study found that less than one percent of 231 men who had viewed child pornography (but with no evidence of a prior hands-on sexual offense) had gone on to commit a hands-on sexual offense.6 From a purely statistical standpoint (all else being equal) individuals with no history of a hands-on sexual offense against a child, but who have accessed child pornography, are at low risk as a group of committing a hands-on sexual offense in the future.5

[FavelaDweller]

i used to think that maybe mrz is just some kind of law enforcement honeypot

but it seems like he's an actual real person who writes these walls of text and legitimately defends cp


i don't know if it's even possible to make him step out of the cave

It is his full time job.

[fuckgoebbelz]

Given that the Sex Cult receives millions of dollars in funding from the United States government toward the construction of their make believe fantasy world, and seeing as the Sex Cult is not confined to any extent whatsoever by the rule of law or the constitution, I see it as obligatory to devote as much of my life as possible to trying to inform as many people as possible of their fraudulent and in fact criminal nature.

It should be noted that if logic and rationality fail to bring about the enforcement of constitutional law in the United States, the secondary strategy toward doing so involves identifying justices of the United States who express support for this religious establishment, and shooting them to death for their treason.

I have no intention of being subjected to terrorism at the hands of the religiously insane without eventually retaliating against them. I am constitutionally protected from religious establishments including the Sex Cult, and I fully demand for my constitutional protections to be upheld by this nation rather than disregarded due to the psychotic decompensation of religious terrorists. If I am subjected to religious terrorism in the United States, the favor is certainly going to be returned.

The time for the United States to put an end to the illegal subversion of the constitution that is being engaged in due to the beliefs of this religious establishment has long since passed. The continued failure for this to manifest can be seen as nothing other than a subversion of the rule of law in this nation, and rather than sitting back and allowing the religious terrorists to subvert constitutional law toward trampling the disbelievers in their religious establishment to death, the answer is to begin killing them in retaliation.

It is time for individuals with sanity to bring an immediate end to the continued terrorism that this religious establishment is engaging in. Objectively, their entire belief system has been refuted, they believe in fiction materials, they are religiously insane, and they are behaving in an illegal and unconstitutional manner. It is entirely obligatory for the justices of the United States to immediately remedy the illegal violations of the constitution that have been brought about by this movement, their failure to do so calls for them to be murdered.

I don't give, the single slightest fuck about the religious beliefs of the Sex Cult. The Sex Cult has been scientifically demonstrated as being an establishment of religion, how moral people believe the Sex Cult to be is irrelevant, it is irrelevant if society believes in the Sex Cult, it is absolutely a legal constitutional mandate for the violations of the law and constitution that this movement has engaged in to be immediately remedied by the United States government. The United States government is not going to sweep this matter under the rug, they are not going to ignore this matter, they are not going to pretend this matter doesn't exist. The United States government is going to fulfill its legal constitutional obligations or the treasonous religious insurgents who are illegally violating the constitution of the United States are going to be hunted down and murdered.

There is nothing short of a plethora of evidence that the United States government has acted unlawfully in support of this movement. It is an unambiguous matter, and it is nothing other than obligatory for redress to these criminal actions to be immediately provided by the United States government. The failure for the United States government to operate in the confines of constitutional law, will bring about the murders of the justices of the United States who believe they can illegally subvert the constitution.

[fuckgoebbelz]

I seriously am nearing the end of my tolerance for the illegal and unconstitutional actions that I am being subjected to in the United States due to my lack of religious psychosis. My lack of belief in make believe fantasy worlds that don't exist outside of themed collections of fiction materials is extraordinarily detrimental to my well being in this nation, and I am starting to take serious issue with my legal constitutional rights being violated in this manner as the United States government time after time disregards the evidence against these 20th century religious establishments which I entirely lack belief in, and continually allows for them to engage in behaviors which are explicitly prohibited by the constitution.

I am entirely demanding of the full protections afforded to me by the constitution of the United States, and I do not to any extent believe that there is an exception in the constitution made for the believers in such 20th century religious establishments as the war on drugs and the sex hysteria. My lack of defective neural networking is putting me at constant risk of religious terrorism in this nation that has been subverted by the mentally ill believers in themed collections of fiction materials, and it is nothing other than intolerable.

It is intolerable for the justices of the United States to sit back and allow these societal diseases to run rampant without any constraint by the constitution of this nation. The United States is acting in an unlawful, criminal, and unconstitutional manner, and nobody is doing a single fucking thing about it. Literally, the answer to justices of the United States who do nothing as religiously insane terrorists subvert the rule of constitutional law, is to begin killing them off the bench. What else can be done, when the entire political, legal, and media establishment, conspires together toward the dissemination of the fiction materials of this religious establishment?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/...ublic-fear

The criminological concept known as moral panic offers valuable insights into how and why powerful social agents such as the news media and the police deliberately create public concern or fear of an individual or group.

Okay, if the media and the police are going to continue on in these behaviors, and the United States justices are going to sit back and allow them to do so without constraint by the constitution, and so forth, the only option that will be left is to begin murdering people. If the individuals in the United States legal system are so mentally compromised by the fiction materials of these 20th century religious establishments that there is no hope of redress for the criminal violations of the constitution that they are engaging in to manifest through their channels, then redress will be coming down the barrels of guns that are pointed at the religiously insane members of the legal and political establishment of this nation. If you believe that we are going to sit back while these insane terrorists go through the process of abducting and enslaving us for the violations of the laws that arise from their belief in religious fairy tales, you are sorely mistaken regarding this matter. It behooves the agents of the United States legal establishment to do some serious soul searching as to exactly why it is that they are allowing for the constitution of the United States to be violated by these movements, as their failure to address this matter is going to demand that the matter is addressed in manners that result in their brains being splattered across the pavement.

I have demonstrated to any rational individual that the Sex Cult is a 20th century religious establishment. I am fully invoking the establishment clause of the first amendment of the United States constitution against them. I am fully demanding that the justices of the United States immediately neutralize this unconstitutional movement that is subverting and has subverted the rule of constitutional law in this nation. You are constitutionally mandated to do so, you have no legal authority to do anything other than neutralizing the threat that is being posed to me due to my lack of belief in this 20th century religious establishment which I have provided a plethora of evidence regarding why I lack belief in.

Okay, I am not planning to allow my life to be continually made shit due to the fact that the United States government refuses to respect the constitutional legal protections that I am by birth in this nation entitled to. I am not going to have my life made worse due to the belief of mentally ill individuals in a make believe fantasy world described in a themed collection of fiction materials, because I was born in a nation that has a motherfucking constitution. You need to come to terms with the fact that this religious establishment is not legitimate, that their beliefs have been refuted by science, that their materials are fiction materials, and that they believe in a make believe fantasy world, because it is illegal and unconstitutional for this movement to continue operating with the support of the United States of America. If these treasonous religious terrorists are not brought to heel by constitution respecting members of the United States legal establishment, they will leave no choice other than to begin killing people in retaliation.

This is no joking matter, this is no laughing matter, this is a matter that demands being taken very motherfucking seriously and the United States is currently not taking this matter with the seriousness that it demands. The continued failure for the United States to take illegal violations of the constitution that are leading to mass human rights violations seriously will demand that things are done which cause the United States to take these illegal violations of the constitution seriously. Now, I am trying to be polite regarding this matter, to simply explain the facts of the matter to individuals and to avoid any violent measures seeing as they will certainly result in my demise, but I am not going to sit by as the United States of America illegally strips me of my constitutional protections based on their belief in a make believe fantasy world.

The Sex Cult is a 20th century religious establishment. Their belief system has been disproved. Their argumentation consists of named logical fallacies. Their mythology has been disproved. Their hypotheses have been disproved. Their pseudoscience has been rejected by academia. They have no legitimacy, the individuals who continue to believe in them do so because they are religiously insane, just as why creationists continue to believe in creationism. Factually, your religion is not real and it never has been, it is a shared state of schizophrenia and it is in violation of the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution for the United States to continue supporting, promoting, funding, and enforcing the laws of this religious belief system.

Looking at CP doesn't cause the depicted individuals to feel raped all over again.
It doesn't cause the child sexual abuse rate to increase.
There is no multi billion dollar CP industry.
your pseudoscience has been rejected by academia.
Your arguments are named logical fallacies.
Your statistics have been provably fabricated out of thin air.

Your belief system is a religious belief system. You believe in an alternate reality that has little to no correlation to the state of actual existence. Your collection of slogans to regurgitate has been comprehensively refuted and consists primarily of logical fallacies that are simply structurally unsound. Your mythologies have been refuted by investigative procedures. Your hypotheses have been refuted by science. Your religion has been proven to be make believe, your continued belief in it is a manifestation of anosognosic psychosis and no different from the continued belief in creationism.

[SoCloseYetSoFar]

Kys mrz plz

[fuckgoebbelz]

The judges of the United States legal system who believe in the War On Drugs or the Sex Hysteria should begin being assassinated. They are religiously insane and their religious insanity is violating the rights of the disbelievers. These movements have been refuted and they are illegitimate. They are 20th century establishments of religion and they have no valid legal authority in this nation.

The people who believe in the war on drugs or the sex hysteria are religiously insane and they believe in make believe fantasy worlds that don't exist outside of collections of fiction materials. Until these movements are stripped of their power in this nation, I support and encourage killing the judges of this nation who believe in them as their religious belief in these 20th century religious establishments is leading to the violation of human rights and constitutional law. They are subversive religious insurgents who due to their mental illness brought about by their defective brains are disregarding the constitution of this nation toward the enslavement of the disbelievers in the make believe fantasy worlds described in their themed collections of religious fiction materials. There is no serious debate on this matter, the belief in these movements is nothing other than religious belief, their defective brains are prohibiting them from ending their religious belief in the same manner as the defective brains of creationists prohibit them from ending their belief in creationism.

It is morally and legally justified to begin killing the judges of the United States who believe in the War On Drugs or the Sex Cult, they are religiously insane and their presence in the legal system of this nation is inherently subversive and they pose a clear and present danger to the disbelievers in these 20th century religious establishments who they are compelled to abduct and enslave by the fiction materials of their New Religious Movements.

The judges and others with political capital who believe in these religions should start being murdered immediately until the laws of their religious establishments are abolished. The disbelievers in these fiction materials cannot coexist in this nation with these individuals, so long as the laws of these religions exist the believers in them with political capital should be assassinated toward freedom from their theocracy.

[GutsBerserk]

peados homos and beastlitiy

all mentally ill

[fuckgoebbelz]

Oh I don't contest the notion that actual pedophiles are mentally ill. However, the people who believe in the Sex Cult are just as mentally ill as pedophiles are, they have a form of socially convergent anosognosic schizophrenia and they believe in a make believe fantasy world that doesn't exist outside of their delusional imaginations and a themed collection of fiction materials. The make believe fantasy world the Sex Cult believes in has been proven as nonexistent by the scientific method and other investigative procedures, but their defective brains prohibit them from coming to terms with this in exactly the same manner as the defective brains of the believers in creationism prohibit them from updating their beliefs in response to evidence.

The Sex Cult has the socially convergent delusion that they are protecting children from being magically raped all over again and are combating a rapidly growing multi billion dollar CP industry that doesn't actually exist, and that viewing CP causes more child sexual abuse via supply demand economics even though the totality of scientific evidence has refuted this notion, among numerous other things. They are a 20th century religious establishment, they have a collection of stereotyped logically fallacious arguments that they use in support of the legitimacy of their religious establishment, along with a host of mythology, superstition, and academically rejected pseudoscientific publications from conflict of interest researchers who profit from the prison industrial complex.

There is absolutely no legitimacy to the belief system of the Sex Cult, it is a shared schizophrenic delusional belief system and it has little to no correlation to anything in the state of actual existence, but no matter how clearly this is demonstrated to them and no matter how much scientific evidence is demonstrated against the notion that their beliefs are legitimate, they are virtually incapable of ending their belief and continue on reciting nearly verbatim their stereotyped utterances and telling their myths and so forth. They are properly classified as a 20th century religious establishment, and the congress of the United States violated the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution when they passed legislation based on the belief in their make believe fantasy world that came about when they had a grant embezzling satanic abuse expert give them testimony on the matter during a time period around which the media was reporting on the delusions of schizophrenics who believed that magical flying teachers were raping their children in the name of the dark lord Satan.

The Sex Cult has quite a complex belief system including things such as this:

Some scientist are actually claiming that child sex dolls may reduce pedophilia.

'To the contrary, these dolls create a real risk of reinforcing pedophilic behavior and they desensitize the user causing him to engage in sicker and sicker behavior,' Goodlatte stated.

The Sex Cult knows that the scientists are wrong because the scientists don't believe in the religion of the Sex Cult. The Sex Cult has a substantial collection of things to say regarding pertinent topics, which they apparently memorize and regurgitate nearly verbatim when triggered by the appropriate stimulus. None of the things they rote memorize are actually supported by science or correlated to the state of actual reality, but they know the appropriate time to regurgitate the appropriate piece of scripture and they become enraged at individuals (such as actually legitimate scientists) who fail to regurgitate the correct piece of verbatim rote memorized scripture at the appropriate time (typically brought about due to stating things that are actually scientifically supported and which correlate to the state of actual reality).

The appropriate piece of scripture for the Sex Cultists to regurgitate:

https://www.pathtojustice.com/blog/masha...y-victims/

Therefore, as these graphic sexual images populate and spread, we can unfortunately predict there will be more child sexual abuse.

The actual scientifically supported position:

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/...-1042321-0

Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.
Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer’s journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children

The Sex Cultists fail to differentiate between statements which are correct to regurgitate in the confines of their religious belief system and statements which are actually correlated to the state of actual reality. The Sex Cultists believe they are giving correct answers that are descriptive of actual reality when in actual reality the Sex Cultists are mindlessly regurgitating the correct piece of religious scripture from their religious belief system. The Sex Cult thinks that "correct" is in relation to the confines of their make believe fantasy world rather than the state of actual reality. They know the correct words to regurgitate to be in accordance with their religious establishment, but they are essentially incapable of learning correctness in the confines of actual reality. Indeed, the Sex Cultists consider correctness in the confines of actual reality to be heresy, which is a substantial transgression but not as bad as actual blasphemy.

[fuckgoebbelz]

Examples of arguing with Sex Cultists:

Example One

Sex Cultist: Durh, A child had to be abused to make that video, durrhhh [editors note: a common regurgitation]

Sane Individual: Well geez Sex Cultist, I'm pretty sure a child had to be abused to make this video of a child being tortured to death and his heart ripped from his chest by a cartel assassin, but it is freely available on bestgore and nobody really seems to care about it!

Sex Cultist: Durrrrh, that's different because people masturbate to CP but not gore duhhrhr

Sane Individual: But jeez Sex Cultist I thought you just said the problem with looking at CP is that children were abused to make that video!

Sex Cultist: People masturbate to CP though it makes all the difference durrhrhhh

Sane Individual: But Sex Cultist I actually know on IRC an individual who is a class 4 pedophilic sadist and he legitimately does masturbate to gore videos of children having their hearts cut out of their chests after being tortured, even though they are clothed and the videos are available on gore sites!

Sex Cultist: Durrhhhhh but more people masturbate to CP than masturbate to gore!

Sane Individual: So let me get this straight.....the problem with looking at CP is not that a child had to be abused to make the video as children are abused to make gore and you don't care about this, the problem is not that people masturbate to CP seeing as people masturbate to gore and you don't seem to care about this, but rather the problem is that large numbers of people masturbate to CP?

Sex Cultist: Yup, large numbers of people masturbating to imagery of children being abused is bad because it's large numbers of people masturbating to imagery of children being abused, durrhhhhhh. In the case of gore it is just children being abused. In the case of class 4 sadists masturbating to gore of children being abused, they are small in number. But large numbers of people are masturbating to imagery of children in CP, so this is bad because it's large numbers of people masturbating to imagery of children in CP.


__________________________________________


Example Two

Sex Cultist: My god supply demand economics dictates that looking at CP will cause child sexual abuse rates to increase! It's supply demand economics 101!!!!

Sane Individual: Jeez Sex Cultist, it looks like for the past several decades the rate of CP viewing has been exponentially growing and the child sexual abuse rate has just been falling in an inverse correlation in every single country studied! It seems like the substitution hypothesis is the actually scientifically supported hypothesis.

Sex Cultist: Hey buddy, correlation isn't causation, it's statistics 101 lololol!!!1111.

Sane Individual: But Sex Cultist you just predicted that as demand for CP increases so will child sexual abuse, but there wasn't even a correlation to support your hypothesis! Clearly correlation isn't causation, but certainly the lack of a correlation is the lack of causation right!

Sex Cultist: Those studies were made by pedophile sympathizers and pseudoscientific drivel and anyone can make any study but no I don't have any study in support of myself but I could because any study can be had by anyone and pedophile sympathizer pseudoscience blugh

Sane Individual: But Sex Cultist, Milton Diamond is actually an internationally renowned psychologist who has received numerous awards for his work sexology oriented work, and numerous other research teams in nations around the world have found the same results, I mean it seems pretty conclusive that the demand for CP did not cause the child sexual abuse rate to increase.

Sex Cultist: CHILDRUN R MAGICALLY RAPED EVERY SINGLE TIME ALL OVER AGAIN OVER AND OVER AGAIN WHargarblalbdfkordeghops FLYING TEACHER CHILD RAPING MAGIC HAND SIGNAL MIND CONTROL WHarbargaglalgala!! SEKRET TUNNELS SATAN DARK LORD SATAN Whartbaagtalgsdogksdgls

[fuckgoebbelz]

Indeed, the United States is illegally taking measures to humor the believers in the Sex Cult. The rage of the sex cultists at having constitutional law enforced against them is irrelevant. The sex cult can go and fuck itself, it is bound by the rule of constitutional law and it is obligatory for the justices of this nation to cease and desist from their treasonous respect for the beliefs of the sex cult.

The judges of the United States who refuse to disregard the religious belief system of the Sex Cult are deserving of immediate murder. They are subverting the rule of constitutional law in this nation in respect of the believers in a 20th century establishment of religion. The Sex Cult has been refuted by the scientific evidence, their inability to update their beliefs to be in accordance with the scientific evidence is irrelevant to the constitution of this nation.

It is a provable fact that the Sex Cult believes in a make believe fantasy world confined to their delusional imaginations and a themed collection of fiction materials. The Sex Cult is a 20th century religious establishment, and there is absolutely no exemption in the constitution for their religious establishment. The neutralization of the illegal power that congress unconstitutionally bestowed onto this religious establishment must manifest immediately and completely. The failure for the illegal power that this religious establishment was unconstitutionally granted by congress to be stripped from them by the justices of this nation is treasonous and demanding of killing the treasonous justices of this nation toward the restoration of the rule of constitutional law that they are subverting in respect of this 20th century religious establishment.

It is irrelevant if the Sex Cultists believe their fantasy world is actual reality. The Sex Cult is going to need to come to terms with what it means to live in a constitutional nation. The United States is constitutionally incapable of continuing to respect this religious establishment, and until such time that this religious establishment is no longer illegally respected by this nation, the subversive justices of this nation who are criminally subverting constitutional law should have targets on their heads with the aim of blowing their defective neural networking out of their skulls.

Your religious establishment has been disproved. It is entirely make believe and it always has been. It has no legal authority in the constitutional United States of America. Those acting on behalf of this religious establishment in a governmental capacity are doing so illegally and without the authority of the constitutional United States of America. They should be treated as the treasonous uprising that they are and they should have their criminal religious insurrection put down with violent force.

Your defective brains are not to be respected in this nation. You believe in a 20th century establishment of religion, it is fraudulent and it is fictional. Your beliefs are delusions, you are mentally ill in social convergence and you are a 20th century establishment of religion and therefore bound by the establishment clause of the first amendment of the constitution. There is no legally valid fashion by which this religious establishment will not have the rule of the constitution upheld against it, those causing this to not manifest are treasonous religious insurgents who are subverting the rule of constitutional law in respect of their religious belief system, and they should be gunned the fuck down.

[Omnishittient]

I always think of this video when I read "sex cult"

[fuckgoebbelz]

The Sex Cult consists of a movement of individuals who proclaimed themselves as experts regarding matters related to sex, and who gained widespread societal recognition as being the authoritative information source regarding such matters.

This is despite the fact that the Sex Cult is a folk movement with no serious external scientific accreditation. They are the experts of a themed make believe fantasy world of their own fabrication, which they describe to the media as the state of actual reality even though it is a fiction narrative describing their themed fantasy world. Their themed fantasy world has little to no correlation to the state of actual reality. Their internally published pseudoscience is not accepted by mainstream academia regarding the pertinent matters. They have a mythology, superstitions, pseudoscience, and a collection of stereotyped named logical fallacies which they falsely believe are in support of the legitimacy of their make believe fantasy world. They are a 20th century religious establishment and is a violation of the establishment clause of the United States for this religious establishment to be respected by the political and legal establishment.

[Omnishittient]

The Sex Cult consists of a movement of individuals who proclaimed themselves as experts regarding matters related to sex, and who gained widespread societal recognition as being the authoritative information source regarding such matters.

This is despite the fact that the Sex Cult is a folk movement with no serious external scientific accreditation. They are the experts of a themed make believe fantasy world of their own fabrication, which they describe to the media as the state of actual reality even though it is a fiction narrative describing their themed fantasy world. Their themed fantasy world has little to no correlation to the state of actual reality. Their internally published pseudoscience is not accepted by mainstream academia regarding the pertinent matters. They have a mythology, superstitions, pseudoscience, and a collection of stereotyped named logical fallacies which they falsely believe are in support of the legitimacy of their make believe fantasy world. They are a 20th century religious establishment and is a violation of the establishment clause of the United States for this religious establishment to be respected by the political and legal establishment.

would you penetrate a dolphin?

[dat feel]

it boggles my mind that you continue railing about the 'Sex Cultists' in such concise, carefully crafted original walls of text